Who is TECHNICALLY better? David Haye or Wladamir Klitschko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxing Scene
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 7105
    • 915
    • 1,705
    • 29,819

    #21
    Originally posted by lfc19titles
    all wlad can do is jab jab and hold, throws the odd right but holds if they get in

    haye would out box and knock wlad out when they fought

    haye bya country mile
    Jab jab jab, knockout. You forgot that part.

    Comment

    • hugh grant
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 30541
      • 2,200
      • 925
      • 105,596

      #22
      I know haye hits hard and is fast, and i am almost thinking that is all you need.
      I dont know what it is haye does that makes him so hard to beat? Even with a chin like his people dont seem to have an answer on how to beat him. Surely it should be as easy as landing a punch on his jaw? One of lifes mysteries? Arent you supposed to have a chin to reach the top? Look at the stick Khan still gets for getting knocked out ONCE!!!!!

      Comment

      • IronDanHamza
        BoxingScene Icon
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 49568
        • 5,042
        • 270
        • 104,043

        #23
        Poll added.

        Comment

        • Banderivets
          'Ah Mr Haye'
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2004
          • 3659
          • 202
          • 74
          • 17,721

          #24
          its discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.

          Wlad is technically better.

          Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.

          Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.


          Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.

          WLAD=Technical in every respect.

          If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.

          Comment

          • Rick Grimes
            The Walking Dead
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 5517
            • 253
            • 18
            • 517

            #25
            Originally posted by Ukr_Alex
            its discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.

            Wlad is technically better.

            Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.

            Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.


            Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.

            WLAD=Technical in every respect.

            If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.
            You say people don't know what they're talking about and then go and call Haye a slugger.

            Comment

            • Walt Liquor
              the opposite of pure
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 21667
              • 913
              • 1,369
              • 40,313

              #26
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza
              Just had this discussion. Was wondering people's thoughts?
              Quick conversation I presume.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49568
                • 5,042
                • 270
                • 104,043

                #27
                Originally posted by Walt Liquor
                Quick conversation I presume.
                Unfortunatly not, went on for a painfully long time and is still ongoing.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 49568
                  • 5,042
                  • 270
                  • 104,043

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Ukr_Alex
                  its discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.

                  Wlad is technically better.

                  Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.

                  Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.


                  Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.

                  WLAD=Technical in every respect.

                  If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.
                  Pretty much the point of this thread.

                  Comment

                  • IronDanHamza
                    BoxingScene Icon
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 49568
                    • 5,042
                    • 270
                    • 104,043

                    #29
                    Originally posted by hugh grant
                    I know haye hits hard and is fast, and i am almost thinking that is all you need.
                    I dont know what it is haye does that makes him so hard to beat? Even with a chin like his people dont seem to have an answer on how to beat him. Surely it should be as easy as landing a punch on his jaw? One of lifes mysteries? Arent you supposed to have a chin to reach the top? Look at the stick Khan still gets for getting knocked out ONCE!!!!!
                    Ok but that's not the question. It's who is better strictly TECHNICALLY

                    Comment

                    • Walt Liquor
                      the opposite of pure
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 21667
                      • 913
                      • 1,369
                      • 40,313

                      #30
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                      Unfortunatly not, went on for a painfully long time and is still ongoing.
                      I don't get it. It's not even close. Haye is an athletic fighter. Wlad is an athletic technically sound boxer with a stone cold right hound. He fights with a textbook boxing style. I can picture my old coach explaining the right way to throw the jab and 1-2. He could have just showed a video of wlad if hexwas around back then. Plus wlad's footwork. He always steps with the front and back with the back and keeps his balance very well in all directions.

                      His hook off the jab is textbook.

                      Lfctitles has zero credibility, don't even listen to him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP