Who is TECHNICALLY better? David Haye or Wladamir Klitschko?
Collapse
-
-
I know haye hits hard and is fast, and i am almost thinking that is all you need.
I dont know what it is haye does that makes him so hard to beat? Even with a chin like his people dont seem to have an answer on how to beat him. Surely it should be as easy as landing a punch on his jaw? One of lifes mysteries? Arent you supposed to have a chin to reach the top? Look at the stick Khan still gets for getting knocked out ONCE!!!!!Comment
-
-
its discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.
Wlad is technically better.
Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.
Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.
Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.
WLAD=Technical in every respect.
If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.Comment
-
You say people don't know what they're talking about and then go and call Haye a slugger.its discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.
Wlad is technically better.
Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.
Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.
Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.
WLAD=Technical in every respect.
If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Pretty much the point of this thread.its discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.
Wlad is technically better.
Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.
Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.
Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.
WLAD=Technical in every respect.
If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.Comment
-
Ok but that's not the question. It's who is better strictly TECHNICALLYI know haye hits hard and is fast, and i am almost thinking that is all you need.
I dont know what it is haye does that makes him so hard to beat? Even with a chin like his people dont seem to have an answer on how to beat him. Surely it should be as easy as landing a punch on his jaw? One of lifes mysteries? Arent you supposed to have a chin to reach the top? Look at the stick Khan still gets for getting knocked out ONCE!!!!!Comment
-
I don't get it. It's not even close. Haye is an athletic fighter. Wlad is an athletic technically sound boxer with a stone cold right hound. He fights with a textbook boxing style. I can picture my old coach explaining the right way to throw the jab and 1-2. He could have just showed a video of wlad if hexwas around back then. Plus wlad's footwork. He always steps with the front and back with the back and keeps his balance very well in all directions.
His hook off the jab is textbook.
Lfctitles has zero credibility, don't even listen to him.Comment
Comment