posters on here argued with me last night that shane,margo had better resumes than

[Squirtz]

it was last fawking night why u still blabbing about it? ur like that whiny girlfriend who got butthurt last night because of some bullshiet and u bring it up again the next day to add more bullshiet! ur a fawking grown up dude stfu and be a man. it's just floyd he doesn't even know u biatch!

[infamous larryx]

it was last fawking night why u still blabbing about it? ur like that whiny girlfriend who got butthurt last night because of some bullshiet and u bring it up again the next day to add more bullshiet! ur a fawking grown up dude stfu and be a man. it's just floyd he doesn't even know u biatch!

shut up b1tch

[ChampBox@PR]

did they fight better competition? yes
did they always win? no
is that why floyd doesn't fight tough competition? yes

bingo!!!!!

[Left Hook Tua]

he was undefeated,p4p and a betting favorite to destroy floyd

delahoya was ranked higher p4p at the time than corrales ever was.

not to mention delahoya was also as high as #1 p4p at one point.


corrales was a slight favorite , let's not pretend like it some huge upset and flyd defied the odds.


corrales at the time floyd fought him , was a 130 champ for about 2 years with his big wins coming from beating roberto garcia , angel manfredy and derrick gainer.

delahoya at the time mosley fought him , was a 130/135/140/147 champ with wins over john john molina , rafael ruelas , genaro hernandez , jesse james leija , julio cesar chavez , jorge paez , pernell whitaker , hector camacho , oba carr , ike quartey.

not only that but mosley had just come up straight from 135 to 147 a year earlier.

to even compare a corrales win to a delahoya win is ridiculous.

[ummeed]

it was last fawking night why u still blabbing about it? ur like that whiny girlfriend who got butthurt last night because of some bullshiet and u bring it up again the next day to add more bullshiet! ur a fawking grown up dude stfu and be a man. it's just floyd he doesn't even know u biatch!

can't.... fcking... stop... lmao!!

[daggum]

no way either has a better resume..theres a reason floyds been on top of the sport his entire career

choreographed retirements, crafty marketing and soft opponent selection

[Left Hook Tua]

I think Floyd has a better resume than both.

I also think its arugable that the Corralles win is better than the first Oscar win.

it's not even arguable really.

[Horus]

floyd

oscar
corrales
castillo
hatton
shane
judah
hernendez



no need to list jmm

Larry why bring up this old ass argument, when you know it is going no where/ Margarito and Shane are no where near Floyd's calibur.
Just let them hate.

Margarito best win: Tainted
Shane Mosley best win: Tainted

One used steroids the other bricks...

End of discussion.

[IronDanHamza]

it's not even arguable really.

In context to your last post and thinking it through more thoroughly, i retract my statment. Its not arugbale, Oscar was a better win. I got a little ahead of myself there.

[DTanc]

Why don't we throw Oscar out for both of them since Oscar lost every big fight he ever had.

People seriously underrate the early part of Floyd's career, let's say pre-Gatti. Beating Genaro Hernandez as young as he did in the dominant fashion he did was very impressive. In b/t there and Gatti you have Manfredy (debatable stoppage, but I think he would have won either way), Corrales and Castillo, a 1 loss N'dou, a 1 loss Jesus Chavez, a 2 loss Chop Chop.

More importantly, after winning his first title Floyd never fought another complete bum/nobody opponent. The same can pretty much be said for Mosley, the same can definitely not be said for Margarito.