posters on here argued with me last night that shane,margo had better resumes than

[Left Hook Tua]

Josie Harris


she beat Zab in the amateurs

that wasn't a W for floyd.

it was a no-contest.

she was sleeping when he teed off on her.


manny puts guys to sleep with his punches , floyd wakes chicks up with his......

[shogunn]

Admittingly roiding for the 2003 Oscar right? Not the 2000 Oscar right.

And, the 2000 Oscar at 147>the 2003 Oscar at 154 no?

Anyways, can you name a win better than the first Oscar win? Yes or no? If yes name it please.

35 year old 24/7-oscar, haha

[jrosales13]

no way either has a better resume..theres a reason floyds been on top of the sport his entire career

I would put Floyd overall body of work> Shane.

However, Floyd has no win better than that first Oscar win that Shane has. And, if so what win? Name it?

[Left Hook Tua]

Well to be fair.

A lot thought Oscar should have losses in his record since many thought he lost to Whitaker and/or Quartey a couple years earlier.

get your fair ass out of this thread.

who needs fair?

this is a larry thread.

[jrosales13]

corrales=undefeated,p4p,and considered a beast,and floyd beat SHANE HIMSELF

What made Corrales better than that version of Oscar?

And, Floyd beat Shane 10 years after that first Oscar win man?

[jrosales13]

get your fair ass out of this thread.

who needs fair?

this is a larry thread.

Ibeabuchi>Tua

[SOPH~ REP.]

Its no better its about the same 9 or 10 notables .

[infamous larryx]

what made corrales better than that version of oscar?

And, floyd beat shane 10 years after that first oscar win man?

he was undefeated,p4p and a betting favorite to destroy floyd

[Left Hook Tua]

Ibeabuchi>Tua

blasphemer!

you're going to hell for that.

[IronDanHamza]

I think Floyd has a better resume than both.

I also think its arugable that the Corralles win is better than the first Oscar win.