they didnt.....duck as much as floyd....thats why..........
posters on here argued with me last night that shane,margo had better resumes than
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Admittingly roiding for the 2003 Oscar right? Not the 2000 Oscar right.
And, the 2000 Oscar at 147>the 2003 Oscar at 154 no?
Anyways, can you name a win better than the first Oscar win? Yes or no? If yes name it please.Comment
-
no way either has a better resume..theres a reason floyds been on top of the sport his entire careerComment
-
Well to be fair.
A lot thought Oscar should have losses in his record since many thought he lost to Whitaker and/or Quartey a couple years earlier.Comment
-
Comment
-
corrales=undefeated,p4p,and considered a beast,and floyd beat SHANE HIMSELFComment
Comment