posters on here argued with me last night that shane,margo had better resumes than

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • STRUGG
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 7457
    • 199
    • 152
    • 7,745

    #21
    they didnt.....duck as much as floyd....thats why..........

    Comment

    • Left Hook Tua
      VATNIK
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 62306
      • 7,010
      • 1,581
      • 951,318

      #22
      Originally posted by infamous larryx
      yep those same "some" that dont give floyd credit for anything
      name a floyd win bigger than shane's win over delahoya in 2000.

      name it.

      Comment

      • infamous larryx
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 10881
        • 512
        • 265
        • 1,565

        #23
        Originally posted by jrosales13
        Which Floyd win do you think is better than the first Oscar win for Shane?
        you mean the shane that was admittingly roiding??

        Comment

        • -MAKAVELLI-
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 50080
          • 3,580
          • 2,792
          • 169,000

          #24
          Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
          name a floyd win bigger than shane's win over delahoya in 2000.

          name it.


          Josie Harris


          she beat Zab in the amateurs

          Comment

          • shogunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 4553
            • 168
            • 6
            • 11,224

            #25
            Originally posted by infamous larryx
            it is what it is..but i didnt even list him
            Youre wondering why others have listed shane and margarito having better resume's, and you have JMM on floyds resume, while margarito has sergio martinez and cotto. it is what it is isnt it?

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 739
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #26
              Originally posted by infamous larryx
              you mean the shane that was admittingly roiding??
              Admittingly roiding for the 2003 Oscar right? Not the 2000 Oscar right.

              And, the 2000 Oscar at 147>the 2003 Oscar at 154 no?

              Anyways, can you name a win better than the first Oscar win? Yes or no? If yes name it please.

              Comment

              • infamous larryx
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 10881
                • 512
                • 265
                • 1,565

                #27
                no way either has a better resume..theres a reason floyds been on top of the sport his entire career

                Comment

                • jrosales13
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 32632
                  • 739
                  • 763
                  • 40,023

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
                  that's a no-brainer.

                  mosley beat a delahoya who a lot thought should still be undefeated since many thought he beat tito a year earlier.
                  Well to be fair.

                  A lot thought Oscar should have losses in his record since many thought he lost to Whitaker and/or Quartey a couple years earlier.

                  Comment

                  • $tate of Mind
                    Grinding
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 4271
                    • 237
                    • 91
                    • 21,425

                    #29
                    Originally posted by -pound4pound-
                    some can argue that Shane's wins over a prime and peak DLH would trump anything Floyd has done
                    That's a legit argument although Shane was on roids.......

                    Comment

                    • infamous larryx
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 10881
                      • 512
                      • 265
                      • 1,565

                      #30
                      Originally posted by jrosales13
                      Admittingly roiding for the 2003 Oscar right? Not the 2000 Oscar right.

                      And, the 2000 Oscar at 147>the 2003 Oscar at 154 no?

                      Anyways, can you name a win better than the first Oscar win? Yes or no? If yes name it please.
                      corrales=undefeated,p4p,and considered a beast,and floyd beat SHANE HIMSELF

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP