Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Interesting video on drug test issue

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by davis828 View Post
    It doesn't matter, you're arguing the principle that he came in over at '44 when the fight that was being negotiated was at '47. There's no reasoning for such penalty when there's been no past history of failing at that limit. Mayweather 'ok'd' it regardless, because like they've stated, it wasn't a big deal.

    You're under the impression that he may do to Pacquiao what he did to JMM, but why?

    Now how come Pacquiao hasn't agreed to random testing?
    You should log off.. it seems that you cannot comprehend grade level sentences. It's been repeated over and over.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by V-3 View Post
      He was still interested in making the fight is what I'm saying man. Because of the money that he would get regardless of where they would fight.






      This is quite a new angle. So, drug testing wasn't the sole reason for this fight falling through. Its was the locale as well...hmm..interesting...to say the least.



      its one of the reasons...go all the way back to where i quoted Johnny Chingas...i said 'AND another reason'


      but somehow, to help your argument, you guys tried to twist to seem that it was the only reason


      that's fine...you have your opinions, i have mine

      Comment


      • Originally posted by | THE KING | View Post
        Actually, that is not the 'sole' reason.. and I'm sure you know that.
        I thought you were done with subject? Then try to sell me out for continuing to talk about it, yet you keep chiming in.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by -pound4pound- View Post
          so now you've changed your stance on what you thought was fair?
          I can't say, Mak. The whole thing is disturbing. I would've bent on seven if he asked for that a few months ago. But I'm not a participant. If I was, I would demand full testing on this ****er who can't get his story straight. It's not about what you think, or I think. We just look at the facts of the situation and know that this dude has lied non-stop about testing. And that should make anyone wary.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by | THE KING | View Post
            The money doesn't even come close.. neither of those bums make the money Manny/Floyd pull in.

            Just make the proper weight.
            So what, Pacquiao can request they can't (Guzman, Funeka, Johnson).

            Look, I know they can't because they don't make the money or have the status, but apparently, we're talking about the principles right?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by V-3 View Post
              I thought you were done with subject? Then try to sell me out for continuing to talk about it, yet you keep chiming in.
              What? I stepped out..

              As I said, it wasn't the 'sole' reason and you know it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by davis828 View Post
                It doesn't matter, you're arguing the principle that he came in over at '44 when the fight that was being negotiated was at '47. There's no reasoning for such penalty when there's been no past history of failing at that limit. Mayweather 'ok'd' it regardless, because like they've stated, it wasn't a big deal.

                You're under the impression that he may do to Pacquiao what he did to JMM, but why?

                Now how come Pacquiao hasn't agreed to random testing?


                so now we're using 'past history' to ridicule PAC's request by saying Floyd has never failed to make 47


                that's interesting...no mention of 'past history' of failing tests for PAC but you remain adamant that he HAS to take that test

                Comment


                • Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  I can't say, Mak. The whole thing is disturbing. I would've bent on seven if he asked for that a few months ago. But I'm not a participant. If I was, I would demand full testing on this ****er who can't get his story straight. It's not about what you think, or I think. We just look at the facts of the situation and know that this dude has lied non-stop about testing. And that should make anyone wary.


                  im gonna step out for lunch...this hangover wont go away...we'll continue this in about an hour

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by -pound4pound- View Post
                    its one of the reasons...go all the way back to where i quoted Johnny Chingas...i said 'AND another reason'


                    but somehow, to help your argument, you guys tried to twist to seem that it was the only reason


                    that's fine...you have your opinions, i have mine
                    Mak, I'm not trying to twist nothing. Read what I said. IMO drug testing WAS the sole reason that the fight didn't happen in March. Then, you brought of the locale as a reason too...then I said that was interesting.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by -pound4pound- View Post
                      im gonna step out for lunch...this hangover wont go away...we'll continue this in about an hour
                      neither will this topic apparently

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP