Interesting video on drug test issue

[| THE KING |]

Did Manny ever agree to full testing? Just wondering.

Yea.. can you help your friend davis? He can't seem to understand that making proper weight will make the 'penalty' of the 'stipulation' a non-issue.

[IMDAZED]

remember a few months back and i asked you what YOU thought was fair for a cut off?


remember your answer? because i do....

Of course I do. But what does that have to do with whether or not Manny Pacquiao has

1. Lied throughout the process

2. Never agreed to full testing

3. Never will

?

?

?

[mikemurni]

Exactly. So what's your point again? Floyd will make weight, making the 'stipulation' a non-issue. You understanding that yet?

No he won't.. believe me he won't..

[IMDAZED]

Yea.. can you help your friend davis? He can't seem to understand that making proper weight will make the 'penalty' of the 'stipulation' a non-issue.

When did he agree to full testing?

[| THE KING |]

Of course I do. But what does that have to do with whether or not Manny Pacquiao has

1. Lied throughout the process

2. Never agreed to full testing

3. Never will

?

?

?

Full testing? Do you mean year round testing including off-times/vacations? If so, name another boxer who does that?

[V.WEBB]

yes...im sure Bob's interest peaked when Floyd told him no and tried to dictate testing to his fighter...great logic dude

He was still interested in making the fight is what I'm saying man. Because of the money that he would get regardless of where they would fight.

PAC's stips was 'dont come in overweight like the JMM fight'

Floyd's stips consisted of 'no to texas' and drug testing...if you cant see why Top Rank walked away then i dont know what to tell you

^^^^ that's what it boils down to.. for the simpletons.

This is quite a new angle. So, drug testing wasn't the sole reason for this fight falling through. Its was the locale as well...hmm..interesting...to say the least.

[IMDAZED]

Full testing? Do you mean year round testing including off-times/vacations? If so, name another boxer who does that?

No, I mean full testing according to US/WADA. Now what?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Of course I do. But what does that have to do with whether or not Manny Pacquiao has

1. Lied throughout the process

2. Never agreed to full testing

3. Never will

?

?

?

so now you've changed your stance on what you thought was fair?

[deejd]

I tried tellin' him that for 10 pages... Believe me, it wont synch in.. His argument will always be "Oh my God, So what! Floyd has never came in over 147 in all his previous fights"

It doesn't matter, you're arguing the principle that he came in over at '44 when the fight that was being negotiated was at '47. There's no reasoning for such penalty when there's been no past history of failing at that limit. Mayweather 'ok'd' it regardless, because like they've stated, it wasn't a big deal.

You're under the impression that he may do to Pacquiao what he did to JMM, but why?

Now how come Pacquiao hasn't agreed to random testing?

[| THE KING |]

He was still interested in making the fight is what I'm saying man. Because of the money that he would get regardless of where they would fight.






This is quite a new angle. So, drug testing wasn't the sole reason for this fight falling through. Its was the locale as well...hmm..interesting...to say the least.

Actually, that is not the 'sole' reason.. and I'm sure you know that.