Dan Rafael: "A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"
Collapse
-
-
over the course of the past 3 years dan rafael has lost most of his credibility as a boxing analyst, his articles have become more and more skewed and opinionated, rather that providing insightful information, i think that espn should soon reconsider a replacement, kevin lole has far less experience as a boxing analyst but has provided far more unbiased articles and less hearsay(even though dan rafael is in the "circle)
dan rafael has objectives in his pieces and is falling not far from marley
...........
Comment
-
didn't you know?
If you disagree with anything he says about Floyd....you're a *******.
It's his whole imbecilic, lame-brain logic. ****, I argued that Arguello's resume makes Floyd's look like an amateur fighter's (obviously exaggerating) and all of a sudden I'm a *******.Comment
-
i talking bull****? do you want me to post facts. b/c everyone, Koncz, Arum, Team May and GBP, stated that manny didnt accept floyds demands.
its stated by the mediator that manny walked away from the 1st negotation after getting 14 days. shall i post links?
i know you will choose to ignore tham. again, delusion his a b*tch
realist dont lie when slapped in the face with factsComment
-
Comment
-
Comment

Comment