Dan Rafael: "A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SuckaPunch
    One Lethal Punch
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2005
    • 4377
    • 540
    • 1,755
    • 25,230

    #1

    Dan Rafael: "A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"

    from Dan Rafael's latest article



    The biggest revelation in the episode came when Michael Koncz, Pacquiao's adviser, said that Pacquiao had agreed to "pretty much" anything related to drug testing during the second round of failed negotiations for a fight with Floyd Mayweather Jr., as long as there was a seven-day cutoff before the fight. Previously, Pacquiao had been stuck on 14 days, so that was the most newsworthy thing to come out of the episode. (My opinion: A seven-day cutoff is quite reasonable and showed that Pacquiao, who at one point would only commit to a 30-day cutoff, has compromised a lot while Mayweather has refused to budge.)
    http://espn.go.com/sports/boxing/blo...4-7-fight-camp
    175
    Yes
    75.43%
    132
    No
    20.57%
    36
    Maybe
    4.00%
    7
  • -MAKAVELLI-
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 50080
    • 3,580
    • 2,792
    • 169,000

    #2
    ask the company that tested PBF and Shane if 7 days was more than good enough...those fools stopped at 18

    Comment

    • Red_Menace
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2005
      • 1427
      • 44
      • 120
      • 7,977

      #3
      No, they didn't. As far as Floyd and Mosley knew, they could still be tested at any time. What Pac's team is asking for is entirely different. They want a window where they are 100% sure they will not be tested. I'm not sure how you can't see or understand the difference.

      Edit: And Dan Rafael is an idiot. If Usain Bolt said he didn't want to be tested the week leading up to a race, what would you think? Sorry, but the testing demand was fair, even though it is not standard in boxing at this point. It's an internationally recognized program, and completely safe for athletes.
      Last edited by Red_Menace; 10-27-2010, 02:58 PM.

      Comment

      • NesNY
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 1603
        • 74
        • 26
        • 7,728

        #4
        Give it a rest.

        Neither of these fighters will deal with anyone who will dictate terms to them. They don't need each other and make it blatantly obvious.

        The sport itself needs this fight, but the fighters don't.

        Comment

        • Kagami Taiga
          Generation of Miracles
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 19078
          • 703
          • 228
          • 40,183

          #5
          Originally posted by NesNY
          Give it a rest.

          Neither of these fighters will deal with anyone who will dictate terms to them. They don't need each other and make it blatantly obvious.

          The sport itself needs this fight, but the fighters don't.
          there seems to be truth in what u speak...im tired of the whole ost debate. both sides have legit arguments. if they arent gonna fight, then let it die out already. the reason dan ******* keeps talking about it is because its proly one of the few boxing related topics he actually has some idea about

          Comment

          • ModernTalking
            Cuckold **** Connoisseur
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 6621
            • 272
            • 0
            • 13,009

            #6
            PAC can still use PED in those 7 days and become a monster in the ring. PAC need to be test everyday. But Pac is still easy work though, easier than Marquez.

            Comment

            • Souroush1
              Contender
              • Apr 2010
              • 134
              • 16
              • 1
              • 6,232

              #7
              over the course of the past 3 years dan rafael has lost most of his credibility as a boxing analyst, his articles have become more and more skewed and opinionated, rather that providing insightful information, i think that espn should soon reconsider a replacement, kevin lole has far less experience as a boxing analyst but has provided far more unbiased articles and less hearsay(even though dan rafael is in the "circle)

              dan rafael has objectives in his pieces and is falling not far from marley

              Comment

              • ИATAS
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 36648
                • 2,509
                • 1,953
                • 50,835

                #8
                Originally posted by NesNY
                Give it a rest.

                Neither of these fighters will deal with anyone who will dictate terms to them. They don't need each other and make it blatantly obvious.

                The sport itself needs this fight, but the fighters don't.
                best answer

                Comment

                • STRUGG
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 7457
                  • 199
                  • 152
                  • 7,745

                  #9
                  Well b1tchweather thinks..........his legacy is secure................pfftttttt.......

                  Comment

                  • Sweet Jesus
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 11512
                    • 568
                    • 332
                    • 13,576

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Souroush1
                    over the course of the past 3 years dan rafael has lost most of his credibility as a boxing analyst, his articles have become more and more skewed and opinionated, rather that providing insightful information, i think that espn should soon reconsider a replacement, kevin lole has far less experience as a boxing analyst but has provided far more unbiased articles and less hearsay(even though dan rafael is in the "circle)

                    dan rafael has objectives in his pieces and is falling not far from marley
                    ESPN doesn't care. It's boxing.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP