Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dan Rafael: "A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Red_Menace View Post
    Well, Pac didn't say, "let's get it on." He said, "I want 7 days."

    Besides that, I don't give a **** about Floyd Mayweather. The reason I think Pac might be cheating is because he refused to participate in strict drug testing. It's as simple as that. There is no good reason to avoid it. It's safe and there are thousands of other people (athletes) that do it every year. Pac should have agreed to the testing if he's honest, professional and has nothing to hide. This is the era of cheating in sports. It happens in every major sport at the highest level. What Floyd asked for is considered the best testing program in the world. It is designed by the real experts, so I'm going to take their word and trust that it is the best testing program. What reason does Pac, or you, have to doubt that? Why shouldn't Pac do it, without a cutoff?

    You nor anyone else can even explain why he needs to agree to any extra tests other than, "because Floyd thinks hes on something".
    Originally posted by p4p-champ View Post
    "lets get it on but no testing 30 days out.....no wait, no testing 24 days out....no wait, I want to fight! FULL RANDOM TESTING, I SWEAR!....no wait, make that 7 days out....i don't wanna fight."
    You nor anyone else can even explain why he needs to agree to any extra tests other than, "because Floyd thinks hes on something".

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Red_Menace View Post
      He ducked the drug test. Who cares about NSAC? As a fight fan, and a sports fan, don't you want to know these guys aren't cheating? Why not demand the best testing?

      Again, who cares about Floyd, what he's done in the past or now? I don't.
      Hmmm, it wasnt a concern Pre Floyd vs. Pac but now strict drug testing is now? Kinda fishy dont you think considering Floyds history of finding a way NOT TO FIGHT a particular opponent..

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Johnny Chingas View Post
        So why isn't Floyd being tested year round?
        Because Floyd's supporters in this matter are effing IDIOTS!


        They say OST. OST is RANDOM all year.

        What Floyd is insisting is his 'way' and Tygart's testing. This is a special testing procedures created for Tygart's client floyd.

        These guys are too idiotic to comprehend.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Castor_Troy View Post
          Because Floyd's supporters in this matter are effing IDIOTS!


          They say OST. OST is RANDOM all year.

          What Floyd is insisting is his 'way' and Tygart's testing. This is a special testing procedures created for Tygart's client floyd.

          These guys are too idiotic to comprehend.
          I know, its just funny when I get to watch a dog chase its tail.

          Comment


          • even *****s voted 14 days is fair let alone 7 days???

            Comment


            • This is mind blowing. When someone calls me a cheater, all I want to do is prove them wrong. Pac had an easy way to prove Mayweather wrong, and he avoided it. It's as simple as that.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by -pound4pound- View Post
                ask the company that tested PBF and Shane if 7 days was more than good enough...those fools stopped at 18
                and this fool still doesn't understand the deterrent behind full random drug testing.

                "We chose not to test for blood closer to the fight than we did because there was no need to do so. But, of course, if we had some sort of cause or su****ion that meant that we needed to do more blood tests, let's say, five days, or, four days before a fight, then we certainly would have done it. And that's why the right to have that option is such an important aspect to having a good program. It's a deterrent for the fighters," said Tygart.

                "[We were] totally comfortable only having that blood test 18 days before the fight and not needing one more testing day in between. And importantly, the reality is, the people who want to criticize, they were hoping that we were going to blood test the day of the fight or the day before the fight, or two days or four days before the fight," said Tygart.

                "And then, they were going to hope and pray that whatever fighter lost, that fighter was going to blame the blood test," said Tygart. "So since that didn't happen -- and that testing didn't need to happen to have an effective program -- they now have to try to complain that the window was too big."

                Citing his last defeat, a unanimous decision loss to Erik Morales in March of 2005, the 31-year-old, Pacquiao (51-3-2, 38 knockouts) -- a newly-elected, Philippines congressman -- contends that drawing blood within days of the bout weakens him.


                ...lol drawing a teaspoon of blood weakens him. I still get a kick out of that shit.
                Last edited by p4p-champ; 10-27-2010, 08:40 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Red_Menace View Post
                  This is mind blowing. When someone calls me a cheater, all I want to do is prove them wrong. Pac had an easy way to prove Mayweather wrong, and he avoided it. It's as simple as that.


                  When someone calls me a cheater,

                  they better have something factual to base it on.

                  You may bow down and cater to your accusers on their whim,

                  I and many other men don't.

                  If you don't have evidence to even suggest that I was cheating,

                  why would I waste my time defending myself?


                  "Because Sosa said so?"

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Johnny Chingas View Post
                    When someone calls me a cheater,

                    they better have something factual to base it on.

                    You may bow down and cater to your accusers on their whim,

                    I and many other men don't.

                    If you don't have evidence to even suggest that I was cheating,

                    why would I waste my time defending myself?


                    "Because Sosa said so?"
                    Proving you're clean is an American thing.....you wouldn't know that...being here illegally.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Red_Menace View Post
                      This is mind blowing. When someone calls me a cheater, all I want to do is prove them wrong. Pac had an easy way to prove Mayweather wrong, and he avoided it. It's as simple as that.
                      He has passed 11 NSAC tests....the test you are talking about are the Mayweather tests that Floyd keeps on insisting. It's a demand not a mandatory. If someone calls somebody a cheater, the reaction will depend on who he is. People are different. If a 12 yr old kid tells me I'm a liar, would I go through a lie detector test to prove I'm not or would I say "Fuck You"?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP