Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Manny Pacquiao takes on all comers, really?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Willy Wanker View Post
    pac took on all comers that were available. he took challenges that a lot of boxing experts said he would lose to. all the arguments about pac not being able to take a real welterweight punch and so forth. i remember the arguments that he wouldn't be able to take david diaz's punches because he's a real lightweight, lmaooooooooo!

    when he proved he could take some punches and beat real welterweights, the haters just said pac's opponents were coming off lackluster performances against nobodies anyways.

    he's on top so haters are gonna hate. haters say pac doesn't take on all comers, but there just jealous because they take on all cummers in the mouth for money, bwahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!

    :bukkake:


    LOL right on the money mate!

    The same haters would downplay every fight pac went before and we're totally surprised Pac endured it all. He's got no chance with Diaz, DLH, Hatton, Cotto, blah blah blah...
    Last edited by Tamis!; 10-23-2010, 07:08 AM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by FootWork777 View Post
      What's good peeps? I'm new to the scene, I enjoy seeing some of the opinions on the board so now I've decided to post myself. Let me start by saying first and foremost I'm a huge boxing fan as well as a Floyd Mayweather fan, yes u can actually be both Anyway, I think that Floyd deserves some crticism, but he takes WAY 2 much IMO, and I'm not talking about his legal issues, nobody who wasn't involved really knows what went down. I'm talking about what goes down strictly in the ring, particularly as far as oppostion.

      Manny Pacquiao is a tremendous fighter, probably the best offensive fighter in the sport 2day. However, his competition since his move up to welterweight leaves a lot to be desired. Manny has fought Oscar (busted up by freaking Steve Forbes previous fight), Ricky Hatton (badly koncked out by Floyd before fighting Manny), Miguel Cotto (took savage beating by Margarito before fighting Manny), Joshua Clottey (who just lost to Cotto before fighting Manny), and now he's fighting Margarito (who just took a massive ass whoopin from Shane). Hmmmmmm.....it seems there's a pattern here. How the hell can anybody say Pacquiao has faced top competition as of late? This is an absolute joke

      People bash Floyd's competition, but Manny's aint any better. Why does he continue to fight slow come forward battered fighters with limited boxing skills? Why the hell doesn't Manny just fight JMM again? I don't care what weight the fight is at, they have unfinished business, everybody knows Pacman vs. JMM 3 would be an extremely lucrative bout. If Manny can spark JMM out so quickly at the higher weights he should just prove it. At least Floyd manned up and proved he could beat Castillo decisively. There are other legit fights out there for Manny such as Berto, the winner of Alexnder vs. Bradley, the winner of Martinez vs Williams, hell even Amir Khan (if he gets past Maidana). I'm sick and tired of Manny being praised for fighting fighters coming off SEVERE ass whoppins. Manny should stop hiding behind Roach and Arum and fight some legitimate competition, whether he fights Floyd or not. Now he's prolly gonna fight Mosley next or Cotto Why do so many of u choose to ignore the facts and heap all this praise on Manny? This is a legitimate question that I want legitimate answers to........
      I been tellin them they don't wanna listen.

      Comment


      • If De la Hoya, Cotto, Hatton, etc... were so easy, why was he predicted to lose those fights?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Willy Wanker View Post
          pac took on all comers that were available. he took challenges that a lot of boxing experts said he would lose to. all the arguments about pac not being able to take a real welterweight punch and so forth. i remember the arguments that he wouldn't be able to take david diaz's punches because he's a real lightweight, lmaooooooooo!

          when he proved he could take some punches and beat real welterweights, the haters just said pac's opponents were coming off lackluster performances against nobodies anyways.

          he's on top so haters are gonna hate. haters say pac doesn't take on all comers, but there just jealous because they take on all cummers in the mouth for money, bwahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!

          :bukkake:
          Took all corners? How? By fighting them all at catch weight? Or fighting them after they lost to floyd? Or fighting clottey who suddenly didn't throw anything even tho when he did the punches connected with mannys head?

          Or saying no to a shane mosley fight as stated by roach on the youtube video?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Pirao View Post
            If De la Hoya, Cotto, Hatton, etc... were so easy, why was he predicted to lose those fights?
            people didn't realize how bad a fighter can look once he comes in at catch weight..oscar de la hoya was for the hospital bed and not for the ring that night.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
              people didn't realize how bad a fighter can look once he comes in at catch weight..oscar de la hoya was for the hospital bed and not for the ring that night.
              yes, cause manny forced him to fight at 147..

              oh wait, it was his fucking idea...

              dumbass
              Last edited by Ryannn; 10-23-2010, 07:33 AM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Pirao View Post
                If De la Hoya, Cotto, Hatton, etc... were so easy, why was he predicted to lose those fights?
                He was a favorite in every fight but the Oscar one.

                That said, I see where you're coming from. De La Hoya was thought to be a serious challenge. In fact, I railed against Oscar for taking on a mismatch instead of fighting Margarito. And I picked Cotto to beat Manny as well. However, this year has been disappointing, no doubt about it. And the blame falls squarely on his shoulders.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
                  Took all corners? How? By fighting them all at catch weight? Or fighting them after they lost to floyd? Or fighting clottey who suddenly didn't throw anything even tho when he did the punches connected with mannys head?

                  Or saying no to a shane mosley fight as stated by roach on the youtube video?
                  The truth kills *******s.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
                    Took all corners? How? By fighting them all at catch weight? Or fighting them after they lost to floyd? Or fighting clottey who suddenly didn't throw anything even tho when he did the punches connected with mannys head?

                    Or saying no to a shane mosley fight as stated by roach on the youtube video?
                    Actually, Pac could have fought Floyd. Unfortunately for us, Floyd tucked his tail behind his legs and ran away to a vaycay.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                      He was a favorite in every fight but the Oscar one.

                      That said, I see where you're coming from. De La Hoya was thought to be a serious challenge. In fact, I railed against Oscar for taking on a mismatch instead of fighting Margarito. And I picked Cotto to beat Manny as well. However, this year has been disappointing, no doubt about it. And the blame falls squarely on his shoulders.
                      Steve Forbes broke Oscar's eyesocket...and he couldn't crack an egg at 130.

                      Anybody thinking Oscar would win must have been high on something.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP