Why Floyd shouldnt get too much a credit...for beating an OLD MOSLEY

[jrosales13]

he beat him did'nt he?....lol

There is a difference between winning and owning.

[puga]

Yeah he beat him, it doesnt change the fact Shane was ranked higher and was clearly looking more impressive at the time. Shane was the best option out there other than Pacqiauo, Period.

yes, i agree it was the best option for floyd altho like i said cotto would've tougher)..it was just too bad tht shane was old and inactive, which is my whole point ....good win at best!

[puga]

There is a difference between winning and owning.

ok then....."beat" him....lol

[IronDanHamza]

yes, i agree it was the best option for floyd altho like i said cotto would've tougher)..it was just too bad tht shane was old and inactive, which is my whole point ....good win at best!

It was the best option for Mayweather according to you, so how can you discredit it if its the best option out there including all options??? I disagree Cotto would not be a tougher fight and i believe your only saying it because its Floyd, had Mayweather fought Cotto you would be saying the opposite.

[MXboxingfan]

1.OLD........
2.INJURED........
3.INACTIVE.....
4. WAR BATTERED.....


take you pick..........

Pacquiao shouldn't get any credit for fighting Antonio Margarito because Margarito was revealed to be a fraud. Without his cheating plaster of paris, Margarito not an elite fighter.

Antonio Margarito was brutalized by a guy who is
1.OLD........
2.INJURED........
3.INACTIVE.....
4. WAR BATTERED.....

Antonio Magarito is not currently ranked either.

[V.WEBB]

It was the best option for Mayweather according to you, so how can you discredit it if its the best option out there including all options??? I disagree Cotto would not be a tougher fight and i believe your only saying it because its Floyd, had Mayweather fought Cotto you would be saying the opposite.

He/she is a delusion "fan".

[puga]

It was the best option for Mayweather according to you, so how can you discredit it if its the best option out there including all options??? I disagree Cotto would not be a tougher fight and i believe your only saying it because its Floyd, had Mayweather fought Cotto you would be saying the opposite.

shane was old and inactive, nothing changes that.....it was a good win for floyd at best!...notdicrediting it,but not trning a blind eye on the win either!

[V.WEBB]

shane was old and inactive, nothing changes that.....it was a good win for floyd at best!...notdicrediting it,but not trning a blind eye on the win either!

You ARE discrediting it. You did alot of that in the other threads that I bumped that were deleted. We aren't ******, we have read your comments, dude.

[puga]

You ARE discrediting it. You did alot of that in the other threads that I bumped that were deleted. We aren't ******, we have read your comments, dude.

if statin facts is discrediting it then i guess...lol....facts are fatcs so sukk it up!

[IronDanHamza]

shane was old and inactive, nothing changes that.....it was a good win for floyd at best!...notdicrediting it,but not trning a blind eye on the win either!

But that is precisely what your doing Discrediting the win, saying Shane was 'old and inactive' discrediting the win but also saying it was the best option for Floyd