Why Floyd shouldnt get too much a credit...for beating an OLD MOSLEY

[jrosales13]

no ...how was that a triangle thoery when i just stated facts?.....

Since the other thread was deleted.

i guess but.....shane was old , inactive.....that is my point!

That is all you have to say. Because, the rest doesn't matter.

Floyd fought the best possible opponent after his negotiations with Pac went no where.

Did he not?

As you admittingly that Shane was #2. Then Floyd did. So then again what is your point?

Are you saying you wanted Floyd to fight a lesser opponent? If so, why?

[jrosales13]

Right, dude is just annoying so I feel the need to comment and call him out on the crap that he posts.

I mean I am not a Floyd fan. And, I am critical of him as well.

But, I don't hate on the guy nor do I go out of my way to descredit every singlt thing he has accomplish.

TS is just a hater. Somebody like Kev and others think I am a hater. But, I just don't think he is the type of fighter that a lot of his bias fans think he is like Kev and so....

That is why I don't have a problem with guys like you or IMDAZED, or Dom who are critical of Pac just because of what his biased fans think of him.

Everybody has their bias, and is cool to be critical as long as you do it with fats and logic. But, just don't be ****** about it and cross the line between hating and nuthuggin like the TS do.

[JET LEE!]

I mean I am not a Floyd fan. And, I am critical of him as well.

But, I don't hate on the guy nor do I go out of my way to descredit every singlt thing he has accomplish.

TS is just a hater. Somebody like Kev and others think I am a hater. But, I just don't think he is the type of fighter that a lot of his bias fans think he is like Kev and so....

That is why I don't have a problem with guys like you or IMDAZED, or Dom who are critical of Pac just because of what his biased fans think of him.

Everybody has their bias, and is cool to be critical as long as you do it with fats and logic. But, just don't be ****** about it and cross the line between hating and nuthuggin like the TS do.

You love the taste of MANNYS ****!!!!!!!

[Double]

Strugg,U are a bonified hater,yes Mosley was old,but boxing scene was loaded with people who knew full well that neither Floyd nor Pacman were the best at 147 as long as neither fought Mosley who obliterated Margarito(maybe ur a newcomer)I don't know!!But regardless of Floyd or Pacman being ranked higher,neither were the best as long as the man that destroyed Margarito was there!!

Further more,everyone said there was no way that Floyd fights Mosley,well guess what,he did!!I do not like Floyd,but he beat the best welterweight out there,that is why,Floyd is now ranked as the number 1 welterweight in the world!!

If Floyd doesn't get too much credit,should a certain someone get any credit for beating Cotto at a catchweight??The hate on Floyd is unbelievable!!I know Floyd has been in there soft for the most part,but he isn't the only 1 & what's good enough for Floyd should be good enough for all welterweights,because the only 2 welterweights that didn't duck fighters were Cotto & Mosley from this era!!Correction,Margarito & the Punisher didn't duck any welterweights either,but then again they were highly avoided!!Margarito was avoided by Floyd(when he was worth something) & the Punisher was avoided by everyone,when he was there alltogether!!

Well stated, I believe this thread can be closed now.

[puga]

Since the other thread was deleted.



That is all you have to say. Because, the rest doesn't matter.

Floyd fought the best possible opponent after his negotiations with Pac went no where.

Did he not?
As you admittingly that Shane was #2. Then Floyd did. So then again what is your point?

Are you saying you wanted Floyd to fight a lesser opponent? If so, why?

wtf you want me to say....altho shane was a good fight for floyd ,..cotto would've been a tougher fight , but shane was still a good fight for floyd....still, floyd fought an inactive and old shane, nothing changes that fact!

[V.WEBB]

I mean I am not a Floyd fan. And, I am critical of him as well.

But, I don't hate on the guy nor do I go out of my way to descredit every singlt thing he has accomplish.

TS is just a hater. Somebody like Kev and others think I am a hater. But, I just don't think he is the type of fighter that a lot of his bias fans think he is like Kev and so....

That is why I don't have a problem with guys like you or IMDAZED, or Dom who are critical of Pac just because of what his biased fans think of him.

Everybody has their bias, and is cool to be critical as long as you do it with fats and logic. But, just don't be ****** about it and cross the line between hating and nuthuggin like the TS do.

Best post that I have read on here in a while. As you said, I don't have a problem with people being critical of Floyd, or any fighter for that matter. That is how it is in sports. But, alot of people do cross that line. As I said before, you are one of my favorite posters on here, keep it up champ.

[IronDanHamza]

wtf you want me to say....altho shane was a good fight for floyd ,..cotto would've been a tougher fight , but shane was still a good fight for floyd....still, floyd fought an inactive and old shane, nothing changes that fact!

Ohh so you would prefer him to fight someone who is ranked lower than him? But for some reason im thinking if it had been the other way round you would be saying the exact opposite.

[puga]

Ohh so you would prefer him to fight someone who is ranked lower than him? But for some reason im thinking if it had been the other way round you would be saying the exact opposite.

please!....cotto owned shane already no matter what the rankings say....shane was a good win for floyd but he was inactive and old, that is a fact homeboy!

[jrosales13]

wtf you want me to say....altho shane was a good fight for floyd ,..cotto would've been a tougher fight , but shane was still a good fight for floyd....still, floyd fought an inactive and old shane, nothing changes that fact!

So you would rather Floyd fought a guy who was ranked lower than Shane and was coming off an ASS WHOOPIN from Pac. Doing the moonwalk before getting stopped over fighting the #2 guy?

Is that what you saying? Really?

Do you honestly think that makes sense?

[jrosales13]

please!....cotto owned shane already no matter what the rankings say....shane was a good win for floyd but he was inactive and old, that is a fact homeboy!

But, look at the time man?

Cotto "owned"(It was not really owning, he won but not owning. Floyd owned Shane, Forrest owned Shane, Winky Owned Shane, Cotto just beat Shane did not own him but whatever) Shane. But, how long ago was that?

Did he do it after getting his face disfigured by Margarito? After doing the moonwalk against a blown JWW? Or was it BEFORE all that?