Why Floyd shouldnt get too much a credit...for beating an OLD MOSLEY

[puga]

But that is precisely what your doing Discrediting the win, saying Shane was 'old and inactive' discrediting the win but also saying it was the best option for Floyd

is that a lie tho?....is it now?.....lol

[V.WEBB]

if statin facts is discrediting it then i guess...lol....facts are fatcs so sukk it up!

But that is precisely what your doing Discrediting the win, saying Shane was 'old and inactive' discrediting the win but also saying it was the best option for Floyd

Right, the dude makes NO sense, at all. He is an alt though, just not sure whose alt he is though.

[jrosales13]

ok then....."beat" him....lol

So we got that cleared up then.

Just we got cleared up that Floyd fought the best possible opponent.

And, the highest rank fighter available.

And, BTW I still don't understand your point about Cotto would be better because he beat Shane. It actually makes no sense. Since Cotto won a competitive fight, but Margaito owned Cotto who made him take a knee, while Shane owned Margarito while doing something not even the great Cotto could do and that is crack Margarito chin. So it makes no sense as to why you would believe that.

[puga]

So we got that cleared up then.

Just we got cleared up that Floyd fought the best possible opponent.

And, the highest rank fighter available.

And, BTW I still don't understand your point about Cotto would be better because he beat Shane. It actually makes no sense. Since Cotto won a competitive fight, but Margaito owned Cotto who made him take a knee, while Shane owned Margarito while doing something not even the great Cotto could do and that is crack Margarito chin. So it makes no sense as to why you would believe that.

its always been clear that shane was a good win as much as its clear that he was old and inactive......cotto is younger than shane and was pretty active not to mention he already beat shane.....based on how shane performed vs floyd anyoe with a brain could see cotto would've done a better job, he would'nt have gassd in 2 rounds , thats for sure!

[jrosales13]

its always been clear that shane was a good win as much as its clear that he was old and inactive......cotto is younger than shane and was pretty active not to mention he already beat shane.....based on how shane performed vs floyd anyoe with a brain could see cotto would've done a better job, he would'nt have gassd in 2 rounds , thats for sure!

So what that Cotto was younger?

Vargas is younger what does that mean?

Hopkins is usually older than everyone of his opponent. What does that mean?

Michael Moore was younger than George Foreman what does that mean?

So what is your point that Cotto was younger?

Cotto beat Shane how long ago? Cotto got sonned by Margarito who got sonned by Shane. So what is your point?

Was Cotto not coming off a severe beating? You don't think that would of affected him fight Floyd right after a severe beating? Really?

Would Cotto have "gassed" after 2 rounds? I doubt it. But, would he had Floyd in trouble like Shane did in round 2? I doubt it. Do you disagree? If so why?

But, anyways that is just an opinion not facts. Fact is Shane was the best and highest rank opponent for Floyd after Pac negotiaitons fell apart.

GTFOH with Cotto, If Floyd would of a taken that fight he would of and rightfully so been shittin for that. After Cotto got dominated. Shane was the right opponent for May 1, 2010.

[THE REED]

So what that Cotto was younger?

Vargas is younger what does that mean?

Hopkins is usually older than everyone of his opponent. What does that mean?

Michael Moore was younger than George Foreman what does that mean?

So what is your point that Cotto was younger?

Cotto beat Shane how long ago? Cotto got sonned by Margarito who got sonned by Shane. So what is your point?

Was Cotto not coming off a severe beating? You don't think that would of affected him fight Floyd right after a severe beating? Really?

Would Cotto have "gassed" after 2 rounds? I doubt it. But, would he had Floyd in trouble like Shane did in round 2? I doubt it. Do you disagree? If so why?

But, anyways that is just an opinion not facts. Fact is Shane was the best and highest rank opponent for Floyd after Pac negotiaitons fell apart.

GTFOH with Cotto, If Floyd would of a taken that fight he would of and rightfully so been shittin for that. After Cotto got dominated. Shane was the right opponent for May 1, 2010.

Period. End of.

[puga]

So what that Cotto was younger?

Vargas is younger what does that mean?

Hopkins is usually older than everyone of his opponent. What does that mean?

Michael Moore was younger than George Foreman what does that mean?

So what is your point that Cotto was younger?

Cotto beat Shane how long ago? Cotto got sonned by Margarito who got sonned by Shane. So what is your point?

Was Cotto not coming off a severe beating? You don't think that would of affected him fight Floyd right after a severe beating? Really?

Would Cotto have "gassed" after 2 rounds? I doubt it. But, would he had Floyd in trouble like Shane did in round 2? I doubt it. Do you disagree? If so why?

But, anyways that is just an opinion not facts. Fact is Shane was the best and highest rank opponent for Floyd after Pac negotiaitons fell apart.

GTFOH with Cotto, If Floyd would of a taken that fight he would of and rightfully so been shittin for that. After Cotto got dominated. Shane was the right opponent for May 1, 2010.

....simple way of looking at it.....if the shane vs cotto was an eliminator to get floyd , cotto would've gotten floyd instead of shane ...right?....simple enough for you?...

[pho_pino]

its always been clear that shane was a good win as much as its clear that he was old and inactive......cotto is younger than shane and was pretty active not to mention he already beat shane.....based on how shane performed vs floyd anyoe with a brain could see cotto would've done a better job, he would'nt have gassd in 2 rounds , thats for sure!

cotto was coming from a manny beat down, you really think floyd would want manny sloppy seconds?

[THE REED]

....simple way of looking at it.....if the shane vs cotto was an eliminator to get floyd , cotto would've gotten floyd instead of shane ...right?....simple enough for you?...

Shane vs Cotto was 2 1/2 years ago..

It wasn't an eliminator, because Cotto got the hell beaten out of him by Margarito and Clottey since the Shane fight.

Which happens to matter.

[PEBBLES!]

Puga is a fucking ******.