So you would rather Floyd fought a guy who was ranked lower than Shane and was coming off an ASS WHOOPIN from Pac. Doing the moonwalk before getting stopped over fighting the #2 guy?
Is that what you saying? Really?
Do you honestly think that makes sense?
So you would rather Floyd fought a guy who was ranked lower than Shane and was coming off an ASS WHOOPIN from Pac. Doing the moonwalk before getting stopped over fighting the #2 guy?
Is that what you saying? Really?
Do you honestly think that makes sense?
well, you asked me if floyd fought the best available guy?....and imo, cotto would've been better altho shane made mor sense because he was rank higher ...
please!....cotto owned shane already no matter what the rankings say....shane was a good win for floyd but he was inactive and old, that is a fact homeboy!
well, you asked me if floyd fought the best available guy?....and imo, cotto would've been better altho shane made mor sense because he was rank higher ...
Yeah makes sense now, you think Cotto was the best option out there having just got smoked by Manny. As appose to a higher ranked coming off a an impressive win Mosley. Makes perfect sense.
Yeah he beat him, it doesnt change the fact Shane was ranked higher and was clearly looking more impressive at the time. Shane was the best option out there other than Pacqiauo, Period.
Yeah makes sense now, you think Cotto was the best option out there having just got smoked by Manny. As appose to a higher ranked coming off a an impressive win Mosley. Makes perfect sense.
it was manny who smoked cotto not shane or floyd ....not because manny did it , you think floyd could too...
well, you asked me if floyd fought the best available guy?....and imo, cotto would've been better altho shane made mor sense because he was rank higher ...
So again Cotto a lesser rank fighter who just got done doing the moonwalk before getting stopped in dominant fashion was a better opponent than the #2 guy?
How can that really make any type of sense to you?
Tweet
Comment