No Ceilings/Burner says roy jones didn't have skills ...lol, WTF! What u guys think?

[Pin Galarga]

-----> http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=426383 page 1 post # 3

... been following boxing my whole life. No Ceilings/Burner i almost always agree with your posts. Your usually right on the money.

I hang out here and read mostly, rarely post though. After the above ^^ comment, i thought that i should ask you WTF >>> wat tha fucc are you thinking man.

..........Roy Jones didn't have skills........ you finally lost me, man, still can't believe you said that shyte. Roy Jones was the most dominant fighter after Tyson. Period. Roy had skills, accuracy, power, combinations ... and MOST of all, he came and brought the fire and made opponents look amature... he didn't run and pot shot like floyd. I am a floyd fan though... Pac too, but lets not fake the funk and act like floyd ****s, cause he don't. Burner if you think Roy Jones didn't have any skills, then you must think the same about Pacman ... cause manny and roy are cut from the same cloth bro.

Roy didn't have skills...your dreaming...and you must have never watched boxing in the 90's then.

Peace out

I wouldn't say ANY, but Roy didn't depend nor looked for boxing skills to get were HE got.
It was all natural reflexes and speed. He never banked on skills which was his father advise.

He did it his way, but yes, I agree until a certain extend.

[Shabba Rank$]

I already explained to Larry reflexes aren't a skill...

[mathed]

I'll say this, Rones had the athleticism and skills of 10 Paul Williams in his little pinky finger

[-MAKAVELLI-]

this is the same fool that said Malinaggi would school PAC easily

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I'll say this, Rones had the athleticism and skills of 10 Paul Williams in his little pinky finger

Stop trolling the thread. Cant you say this about ANY fighter today. Likeeeeeee Tim Bradley?

Get off the Williams routine. Its old and you bring it into every thread bro.

[jrosales13]

Exactly.....

Its right there in the post. I said he does not have the skills to stay a dominant fighter late into his career like Floyd can because Floyd didnt only rely on reflexes.

Im right. Period.

Want a good example: See Bernard Hopkins.

Why is he still relevant as his speed and reflexes have dissapeared?

Because hes skilled as shyt.

Roy even the shot version is still trying to throw triple left hooks and leaning back all the time. He does not have the skills needed to be relevant late in age because 98% of his career he was the most athletic, freakish guy in the ring. Now thats it gone hes nothing right now. Ofcourse other factors come into play. But still.....

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Go read through my posts in this and the other thread.

Im right. Sorry Roy fans. Im one myself. But he relied soley on his athleticism and it cost him.

[-Rab]

i labb uuu burney

[Shabba Rank$]

Goddammm Burner you made an ugly ass ****ing baby

Damn homie.

Low blow.

Take it to the dome.

[brick wall]

Goddammm Burner you made an ugly ass ****ing baby

i lol'd but that's foul. **** on the father but spare the baby.