Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
taylor easily beat hopkins: u ppl are horrible judges
Collapse
-
First off ****sexual, this is my thread, and I laid out a whole, round by round, go back and read it, if you can, I doubt it ******. Not my thread, its the other one I'll link it.Last edited by IwatchBoxing; 07-24-2005, 12:43 AM. -
Excuse me, I have a good argument. Taylor won at least 7 rounds in a fight scheduled for 12 rounds. There were no knockdowns or point deductions. If Taylor wins 7 rounds, that leaves only 5 for Hopkins. 7 is more than 5. Taylor wins.
In boxing, we score by the rounds, see? There is no "take the title from the champion" bull**** in this sport because it is SCORED by the ROUNDS. Judges don't just pick a winner at the end of 12 rounds. They score by the ROUNDS.Comment
-
It was not a close fight, Taylor clearly won more rounds.Originally posted by GodzHandneither man was dominant in that fight, close fight that could have went either way, I'll bet you've been DYING for Hopkins to lose ever since he owned Tito, here's your big chance little guy, live it up!Comment
-
This is dino's thread, try again. And I did read your thread, broken english and flawed points in all. You can't make a good argument for Taylor because you can't even say that Hopkins won 4 rounds. You're an idiot.Originally posted by IwatchBoxingFirst off ****sexual, this is my thread, and I laid out a whole, round by round, go back and read it, if you can, I doubt it ******.
Oh, and keep your ****sexual fantasies between yourself and boyfriends. I don't want any part of your fudge packing ways.Comment
-
Whats to argue, if you saw Hopkin winning the fight, then I recommend you go check your eyes. Seriously a person have to be blind to think Hopkins won the fight.Originally posted by Dirt E GomezMy opinions have a factual base surrounding them. I didn't have anything staked on this fight, nor did I particularly care who won. But I can call bull **** when i see it. If one person can lay down a good argument for Taylor winning the fight I'll be happy. But I can't stand this, "Taylor won becuaes Hopkins ran" or "Taylor won, plain and simple." I have yet to see a good, concise argument from anybody on this board for why Taylor should have won. So, if you can, please feel free to. If not, shut the **** up.Comment
-
-
I wasnt making points, I was describing what I saw on televsion *****, if you cant read it, suck it, not my fault you are too ****** to reconize basic words like "the" and "Hopkins lost".Originally posted by Dirt E GomezThis is dino's thread, try again. And I did read your thread, broken english and flawed points in all. You can't make a good argument for Taylor because you can't even say that Hopkins won 4 rounds. You're an idiot.
Oh, and keep your ****sexual fantasies between yourself and boyfriends. I don't want any part of your fudge packing ways.Comment
-
I will allow this as a good argument... assuming you can ****ing lay out the 7 supposed rounds he won in a good fashion. Obviously Talor won rounds 1, 2 and 6. What other 4 did he clearly win?Originally posted by DiegoFuegoExcuse me, I have a good argument. Taylor won at least 7 rounds in a fight scheduled for 12 rounds. There were no knockdowns or point deductions. If Taylor wins 7 rounds, that leaves only 5 for Hopkins. 7 is more than 5. Taylor wins.
Oh, and Iwatch, nobody can take you seriously if you have the fight scored 10-2. Not even the biggest Hopkin's haters can have it scored that poorly.Comment
-
No you're sounding like an nut-hugger of Hopkins.Originally posted by Dirt E GomezI will allow this as a good argument... assuming you can ****ing lay out the 7 supposed rounds he won in a good fashion. Obviously Talor won rounds 1, 2 and 6. What other 4 did he clearly win?Comment
Comment