taylor easily beat hopkins: u ppl are horrible judges

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IwatchBoxing
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 10527
    • 235
    • 403
    • 11,555

    #51
    Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
    My opinions have a factual base surrounding them. I didn't have anything staked on this fight, nor did I particularly care who won. But I can call bull **** when i see it. If one person can lay down a good argument for Taylor winning the fight I'll be happy. But I can't stand this, "Taylor won becuaes Hopkins ran" or "Taylor won, plain and simple." I have yet to see a good, concise argument from anybody on this board for why Taylor should have won. So, if you can, please feel free to. If not, shut the **** up.
    First off ****sexual, this is my thread, and I laid out a whole, round by round, go back and read it, if you can, I doubt it ******. Not my thread, its the other one I'll link it.
    Last edited by IwatchBoxing; 07-24-2005, 12:43 AM.

    Comment

    • DiegoFuego
      Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2005
      • 17338
      • 1,403
      • 586
      • 24,657

      #52
      Excuse me, I have a good argument. Taylor won at least 7 rounds in a fight scheduled for 12 rounds. There were no knockdowns or point deductions. If Taylor wins 7 rounds, that leaves only 5 for Hopkins. 7 is more than 5. Taylor wins.

      In boxing, we score by the rounds, see? There is no "take the title from the champion" bull**** in this sport because it is SCORED by the ROUNDS. Judges don't just pick a winner at the end of 12 rounds. They score by the ROUNDS.

      Comment

      • Parodius
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2005
        • 2419
        • 84
        • 60
        • 2,759

        #53
        Originally posted by GodzHand
        neither man was dominant in that fight, close fight that could have went either way, I'll bet you've been DYING for Hopkins to lose ever since he owned Tito, here's your big chance little guy, live it up!
        It was not a close fight, Taylor clearly won more rounds.

        Comment

        • Dirt E Gomez
          ***Stupendous***
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 9976
          • 952
          • 1,092
          • 18,863

          #54
          Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
          First off ****sexual, this is my thread, and I laid out a whole, round by round, go back and read it, if you can, I doubt it ******.
          This is dino's thread, try again. And I did read your thread, broken english and flawed points in all. You can't make a good argument for Taylor because you can't even say that Hopkins won 4 rounds. You're an idiot.

          Oh, and keep your ****sexual fantasies between yourself and boyfriends. I don't want any part of your fudge packing ways.

          Comment

          • IwatchBoxing
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 10527
            • 235
            • 403
            • 11,555

            #55
            My round by round, read it, than come with objections by rounds **** faces.
            Talk about anything boxing related here. Where the boxing discussion is always Non Stop!

            Comment

            • Parodius
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2005
              • 2419
              • 84
              • 60
              • 2,759

              #56
              Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
              My opinions have a factual base surrounding them. I didn't have anything staked on this fight, nor did I particularly care who won. But I can call bull **** when i see it. If one person can lay down a good argument for Taylor winning the fight I'll be happy. But I can't stand this, "Taylor won becuaes Hopkins ran" or "Taylor won, plain and simple." I have yet to see a good, concise argument from anybody on this board for why Taylor should have won. So, if you can, please feel free to. If not, shut the **** up.
              Whats to argue, if you saw Hopkin winning the fight, then I recommend you go check your eyes. Seriously a person have to be blind to think Hopkins won the fight.

              Comment

              • sisforshaq
                The CEO of the Scene
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2005
                • 4807
                • 137
                • 35
                • 11,884

                #57
                Close fight, still had it 115-113 Taylor. Looking foward to the rematch.

                Comment

                • IwatchBoxing
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 10527
                  • 235
                  • 403
                  • 11,555

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
                  This is dino's thread, try again. And I did read your thread, broken english and flawed points in all. You can't make a good argument for Taylor because you can't even say that Hopkins won 4 rounds. You're an idiot.

                  Oh, and keep your ****sexual fantasies between yourself and boyfriends. I don't want any part of your fudge packing ways.
                  I wasnt making points, I was describing what I saw on televsion *****, if you cant read it, suck it, not my fault you are too ****** to reconize basic words like "the" and "Hopkins lost".

                  Comment

                  • Dirt E Gomez
                    ***Stupendous***
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 9976
                    • 952
                    • 1,092
                    • 18,863

                    #59
                    Originally posted by DiegoFuego
                    Excuse me, I have a good argument. Taylor won at least 7 rounds in a fight scheduled for 12 rounds. There were no knockdowns or point deductions. If Taylor wins 7 rounds, that leaves only 5 for Hopkins. 7 is more than 5. Taylor wins.
                    I will allow this as a good argument... assuming you can ****ing lay out the 7 supposed rounds he won in a good fashion. Obviously Talor won rounds 1, 2 and 6. What other 4 did he clearly win?

                    Oh, and Iwatch, nobody can take you seriously if you have the fight scored 10-2. Not even the biggest Hopkin's haters can have it scored that poorly.

                    Comment

                    • Parodius
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2005
                      • 2419
                      • 84
                      • 60
                      • 2,759

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
                      I will allow this as a good argument... assuming you can ****ing lay out the 7 supposed rounds he won in a good fashion. Obviously Talor won rounds 1, 2 and 6. What other 4 did he clearly win?
                      No you're sounding like an nut-hugger of Hopkins.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP