taylor easily beat hopkins: u ppl are horrible judges

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DiegoFuego
    Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 17338
    • 1,403
    • 586
    • 24,657

    #61
    See Harold Lederman's card because for the first time in his life, he was completely spot on in a difficult fight to score

    Comment

    • Dirt E Gomez
      ***Stupendous***
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 9976
      • 952
      • 1,092
      • 18,863

      #62
      Originally posted by DiegoFuego
      See Harold Lederman's card because for the first time in his life, he was completely spot on in a difficult fight to score
      Lederman had a decent scorecard for once, I do agree with you. He actually scored it similar to me, except I had Hopkins winning 1 more and a draw 1 round. And I like that you said, "difficult fight to score" because I agree with you.

      Comment

      • DiegoFuego
        Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2005
        • 17338
        • 1,403
        • 586
        • 24,657

        #63
        Don't score rounds even and you won't have that problem, chump. Even rounds are for wusses. Every round has a winner. If you can't figure out who it was, then stop trying to be a judge.

        Comment

        • Dirt E Gomez
          ***Stupendous***
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 9976
          • 952
          • 1,092
          • 18,863

          #64
          Originally posted by DiegoFuego
          Don't score rounds even and you won't have that problem, chump. Even rounds are for wusses. Every round has a winner. If you can't figure out who it was, then stop trying to be a judge.
          Round 4 was the biggset example of an even round in my eyes. I seldomly give them out, and I honestly could not award either fight a decision in that round. Neither did anything to prove they wanted it more than the other.

          Comment

          • FistoftheDallasStar
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 899
            • 55
            • 55
            • 7,873

            #65
            Originally posted by Parodius
            It was not a close fight, Taylor clearly won more rounds.
            Parodius this was a close fight. No matter what you want to believe it was close. No one fighter dominated the other. If it wasn't for an idiot judge giving round 12 to Taylor it would have been a draw. Yes in boxing that's a close fight.

            Comment

            • sisforshaq
              The CEO of the Scene
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2005
              • 4807
              • 137
              • 35
              • 11,884

              #66
              Originally posted by DiegoFuego
              See Harold Lederman's card because for the first time in his life, he was completely spot on in a difficult fight to score
              That would be a correct statement

              Comment

              • Parodius
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2005
                • 2419
                • 84
                • 60
                • 2,759

                #67
                Originally posted by FistoftheDallasStar
                Parodius this was a close fight. No matter what you want to believe it was close. No one fighter dominated the other. If it wasn't for an idiot judge giving round 12 to Taylor it would have been a draw. Yes in boxing that's a close fight.
                If it wasn't for the idiot judge Jerry Roth this fight would've been a UD decision for Taylor. Roth had Hokins winning 116-112. 7 rounds to 3 is not close in my eyes.

                Comment

                • FistoftheDallasStar
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 899
                  • 55
                  • 55
                  • 7,873

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Parodius
                  If it wasn't for the idiot judge Jerry Roth this fight would've been a UD decision for Taylor. Roth had Hokins winning 116-112. 7 rounds to 3 is not close in my eyes.
                  We'll just have to agree to disagree then. I can't wait for the rematch though. It's great when a fight has this much debate on the first match. These are the rematches that are golden. Just like the Corrales/Castillo fight.

                  Comment

                  • DiegoFuego
                    Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 17338
                    • 1,403
                    • 586
                    • 24,657

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Parodius
                    If it wasn't for the idiot judge Jerry Roth this fight would've been a UD decision for Taylor. Roth had Hokins winning 116-112. 7 rounds to 3 is not close in my eyes.
                    excellent point about Roth. WHAT THE F*** kinda scorecards was that?! Isn't he the one that had Mayorga beating Forrest like 116-112? Complete idiot. Jerry Roth is also the guy I believe that gave De La Hoya the 12th round in the Trinidad fight because he had given Trinidad so many earlier rounds he didn't deserve. this guy is horrible, I'm telling you.

                    yes, giving the 12th round to Taylor is ridiculous in this fight, but not nearly as ridiculous as having Hopkins win it 8 rounds to 4!!!!

                    Comment

                    • Dirt E Gomez
                      ***Stupendous***
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 9976
                      • 952
                      • 1,092
                      • 18,863

                      #70
                      I wouldn't say so. Hopkins clearly won more rounds than Taylor, while there were a number that could be debated either way. So having it 116-112 for Hopkins isn't unbelievable in that sense. I don't agree with that, but I can see how it's an option.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP