Will pacquiao 7 weight division championship belt ever be broke?

[jrosales13]

is pact**** this the only reason why pac has the belts he has cause he started so early and stuck with it.

Really? That is the only reason huh? Why are you guys such idiots? When did you guys started watching boxing?

How many fighters have started early? Matter of fact how many great fighters have started in their teens, and I mean HOF'ers and ATG's, how many of them won a lineal title by the age of 19?

And, name all of them cuz the list is very short.

[F l i c k e r]

So why he didn't fight the best was not the point? Then what was the point of your question?

The point was to see who Pasawayako thought he should have fought instead of the people he did fight.

[War Dinamita]

Here we go again with the same ****...

The man is a paper champ at 135.

[Calilloyd]

7 = 168
8 = 175

I highly doubt he even wins a 6th one at 160.

Yet you think Pacquiao can. I see.........

[pasawayako]

pact**** this the only reason why pac has the belts he has cause he started so early and stuck with it.

And pac got those losses because he was fighting too early with his age in professional. Did you know that floyd has 5 or 6 losses in his amateur career?

[pasawayako]

Here we go again with the same ****...

The man is a paper champ at 135.

Floyd is a paper champ in 140-154 lbs.

[Pacquiao'd]

140 and 147 too.

hatton was already destroyed and cotto as well, who pick up his little paper belt pac won at 145(CATCHWEIGHT)

[jrosales13]

You really do underrate Oscar. Oscar would have beat those 2.

No no no no no..... Not the 2007 part time fighter, full time promoter version of Oscar.

What makes you think he would have? Because, he KO'd a guy who chin got ruined by Tito a year before?

And, does Mayorga have the style of Spinks and Dzinziruk? Or does Mayorga have the size of Dzinziruk?

Did Oscar have the stamina to beat Spinks or Dzinziruk?

What made the 2007 version of Oscar so good? Other than a whole year before scoring a KO of a guy who got his chin ruined by Tito.

And, a matter who has Mayorga beating above 147 that made him any good at 154? They only guy he beat was a shot Vargas.

This is what I am talking about when I say Oscar is the most overrated fighter in the last 10 years. People in the last decade had looked at him and tough about him as the Oscar of the 90's but he wasn't. He wasn't as hungry or as good period. He was not active, he wan only a part time fighter, full time promoter.

During this whole decade. Oscar famous left hook only showed up in two fights. Against both fighters who got ruined by Tito.

[piano man]

And pac got those losses because he was fighting too early with his age in professional. Did you know that floyd has 5 or 6 losses in his amateur career?

5 or 6 losses in his amateur carrer


D - a - m - n

[El Jesus]

Could you make that at the time, Hatton arguable was the best fighter at 140?

At the time it was between him and Bradley. It depends on who you would of gone with.

And, for the people that will say Bradley was no doubt. Remember this was in May 2009. So at that time Bradley was not clear cut best fighter in the division.

his showing against Lazcano showed serious signs that he slowed. His fight against Malignaggi was basically his last decent performence, and i say decent because it wasnt super impressive, malignaggi didint have the power to keep him off.

Honestly at that point the only thing that made hatton the best anything at 140 is because he still maintained all the belts there, but it was clear hed lost something when Lazcano hurt him like he did.

this was at a point where i thought 140 was generally weak.