Was Erik Morales in his prime for the 2nd and 3rd Pac fights?

[ADP02]

I think you're wrong. So come up with a new reason. Perhaps if you didn't look at it from this angle, you would see things clearer? Not everyone has an agenda. Actually, the people who want to claim Morales was a great win for Pacquiao are the ones with an agenda. The ones who want to pretend Morales wasn't weight drained are the ones with the agenda.

Like I said in one of my previous posts, if you want to discredit the Morales fights for Manny, then you must discredit most of Floyd's fights in the last 6 years.

I even stated that when Floyd fought Chico, Chico was weight drained but from what I constantly read here, that was Floyd's most accomplished win. Imagine, Floyd's most accomplished win was against a weight drained boxer? Kind of double standard if you ask me!

[IMDAZED]

LOL at 15 *******s saying Yes.

PAKYO, Top Rank/O.S.I.R.I.S., who else?

[Sweet Jesus]

He wasn't prime for any of the 3 fights w/ Pac. He still won one of the fights though.

[IMDAZED]

Like I said in one of my previous posts, if you want to discredit the Morales fights for Manny, then you must discredit most of Floyd's fights in the last 6 years.

And like I said...why do I care? I'm not discussing Floyd and if you want to make that a discussion (whatever opponent(s) you're referring to, feel free). That is IRRELEVANT.

I even stated that when Floyd fought Chico, Chico was weight drained but from what I constantly read here, that was Floyd's most accomplished win. [B]Imagine, Floyd's most accomplished win was against a weight drained boxer? Kind of double standard if you ask me!

How do you know Corrales was weight drained? How did you reach this conclusion? And how is this relevant to Morales? Or the discussion you are having with me? God, you guys think only in Floyd/Pac and have no other logic other than that.

[ADP02]

LOL at 15 *******s saying Yes.

Still, if there was no biased opinion in that poll, you would think he would at the very least have an option for "was past his prime" instead of saying WAY PAST it.

just saying and calling it out the way I see it!

[ADP02]

And like I said...why do I care? I'm not discussing Floyd and if you want to make that a discussion (whatever opponent(s) you're referring to, feel free). That is IRRELEVANT.



How do you know Corrales was weight drained? How did you reach this conclusion? And how is this relevant to Morales? Or the discussion you are having with me? God, you guys think only in Floyd/Pac and have no other logic other than that.

I believe you have mentioned Floyd on the occasion, here? Again, the thread was started because he thinks Floyd is the real fighter of the decade. Please look at the bottom of his posts. He started a similar thread the other day as well. So he wants to discredit as many of Manny's fights as possible

Its so obvious!

[IMDAZED]

I believe you have mentioned Floyd on the occasion, here? Again, the thread was started because he thinks Floyd is the real fighter of the decade. Please look at the bottom of his posts. He started a similar thread the other day as well. So he wants to discredit as many of Manny's fights as possible

Its so obvious!

I have mentioned him in this thread? Where? And then why is the rest of your post directed to someone else? WTF? You need help, man.

[mikemurni]

Still, if there was no biased opinion in that poll, you would think he would at the very least have an option for "was past his prime" instead of saying WAY PAST it.

just saying and calling it out the way I see it!

What is this thread all about anyway. It is about the TS (Horus) tryin to discredit Pac's win over Morales so that they can elevate Floyd's victory over Judah and Baldomir. Thus giving them basis to say that Floyd should have been Fighter of the year in 2006..

It started when Horus/No Ceiling started a thread on who was the better fighter year per year so that he can give 2006 to Floyd instead of Pac. It started because he couldn't accept Pac getting fighter of the decade. If you cant call this discussion having an agenda then I dont know what is...

[ADP02]

I have mentioned him in this thread? Where? And then why is the rest of your post directed to someone else? WTF? You need help, man.

What is this thread all about anyway. It is about the TS (Horus) tryin to discredit Pac's win over Morales so that they can elevate Floyd's victory over Judah and Baldomir. Thus giving them basis to say that Floyd should have been Fighter of the year in 2006..

It started when Horus/No Ceiling started a thread on who was the better fighter year per year so that he can give 2006 to Floyd instead of Pac. It started because he couldn't accept Pac getting fighter of the decade. If you cant call this discussion having an agenda then I dont know what is...

Well IMDAZED, no disrespect intended but this thread is about what I stated. If you believe you are sitting in the line of fire, sorry but this thread has Pac attack (discreditting) written all over it! Don't tell me that you can't see it?

[IMDAZED]

Well IMDAZED, no disrespect intended but this thread is about what I stated. If you believe you are sitting in the line of fire, sorry but this thread has Pac attack (discreditting) written all over it! Don't tell me that you can't see it?

I don't think I care. I'm not taking it personally like you are. The fact is, the TS is asking if Morales was in his prime and he wasn't. That has continued to Morales' conditioning for the fight. However, if you simply aren't focused enough to realize that my argument has nothing to do with Floyd then I can't help you.