Shanes fought many fights out of his weightclass. Won some, lost some. He did very well in my opinion.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Shane Mosley an ATG?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by MARKBNLV View Postin my opinion dlh is the only fighter you listed that is a hofer.Originally posted by Tengoshi View PostThis constitutes ATG? Two of those weight titles were against DLH, one controversially. Also he was losing to Mayorga on my card until the final round stoppage (although I didn't have him losing to Cotto either - had it a draw or Mosley by 1 if I recall). Margarito is what made him HoF worthy, but I find ATG status ridiculous. Mosley's skills are greatly overestimated - speed and power, not skill, are what made him successful. What could have been had he never gone higher then, let's say, 140, is anyone's speculation. Forrest being "way too big" for WW is meaningless - he made the weight limit and never fought above 154. Both times Mosley won championships beyond 135 he immediately encountered opponents he could not conquer.Originally posted by Tengoshi View PostExactly - Mosley's defining moment was moving up two weights to legitimately beat DLH for the welterweight crown after having faced years of questionable opposition. He went into that fight a question mark and came out a champion.
good balanced post guys. i think a lot of people get carried away & judge fighters due to their name recognition. shane only has one hall of famer in his resume oscar & nobody else. He's had a very solid great hall of fame career but its well below ATG status.
if he would have beaten floyd that would have helped his case. shane really wasnt that exceptional of a boxer or technician. he relied a lot on his raw athleticism, speed, & power much like roy jones jr.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by geribeetus View Postundoubtedly top 100
Comment
-
He has a case. Worse guys than Mosley have gotten in. He was always exciting to watch and his only losses were to elites. 3 of those losses were close. He was in the top 10 p4p for 6 or so years. I don't sweat p4p much myself but historians do. He has his share of good wins and belts.
DLH x2, Margarito, Vargas x2, Leija, Mayorga, Rivera, Molina, Holiday
#1 at 135 for a couple of years
#1 at 147 for a couple of years in the early 2000's and again recently
#1 at 154 for a briefly
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostI don't know about that. Shane's two biggest names are Margarito and De La Hoya. Both marred in controversy. I haven't drawn up a list but I'd be hard-pressed to put him in the top 100. So many great fighters. Still, he had a fine career and deserves to be in the HOF.
Comment
-
Originally posted by geribeetus View Postwell, i'm not gonna say he undoubtedly belongs on everyone's top 100. he's def on mine though. what can i say, i'm a fan
Comment
Comment