Khan has been down genuinely 4 times, against 3 fighters (I don't count the Drilzane one, because his feet got tangled between the ropes). Hasn't Gamboa been down even more than that, or at least the same amount? He's at a far lower weight, too. I don't hear anywhere near as much ragging about his seemingly "glass" chin, even though he's still undefeated (although I reckon it's only a matter of time before someone sparks him out).
If Khan gets sparked out again, obviously everyone will be entitled to laff all they went. But if he stands there and dusts off a good shot from a big puncher, I don't want to hear that **** ever again. I'm very much open to the possibility that he's a changed fighter at 140, and won't be Limond'ed or Gomez'ed (i.e. knocked down by light-hitters) anymore. Everything that's been discussed here about his change in conditioning and training is very interesting to read, and all hopefully true.
After all, we haven't seen Pacquiao being Torrecampo'ed or Sangsurat'ed since his young boy days - back then it was wrong conditioning, couldn't make weight, didn't have Roach, defenceless style... Think about it.
If Khan gets sparked out again, obviously everyone will be entitled to laff all they went. But if he stands there and dusts off a good shot from a big puncher, I don't want to hear that **** ever again. I'm very much open to the possibility that he's a changed fighter at 140, and won't be Limond'ed or Gomez'ed (i.e. knocked down by light-hitters) anymore. Everything that's been discussed here about his change in conditioning and training is very interesting to read, and all hopefully true.
After all, we haven't seen Pacquiao being Torrecampo'ed or Sangsurat'ed since his young boy days - back then it was wrong conditioning, couldn't make weight, didn't have Roach, defenceless style... Think about it.
Comment