Reasonable doubt....PEDs

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 738
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #41
    Originally posted by thatnickuh
    You're funny. You're up here arguing my man down over semantics, yet when someone makes valid points that you can't refute you run and hide. Stop being petty man.
    I never run and hide sir, ever. I just don't really have tolerance with dumbass dudes like you.

    Comment

    • brick wall
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 6480
      • 259
      • 35
      • 24,574

      #42
      Originally posted by cixthree
      To be honest its not, but I thought you mite have an op on it is all. I mean id assume you'd think Arum was pretty credable since you defend Team Pac.
      Just putting it out there if you didn't know
      lol another pretty dumb speculation. i'm not defending anybody...i'm just trying to clear out your ******ity...you know the roach and peds link thing.

      Comment

      • cixthree
        I love Manny Pacquaio
        • Nov 2008
        • 2221
        • 152
        • 0
        • 8,387

        #43
        Originally posted by AFighter4U
        TS is Khan taking PEDs? all indications say so.

        1. fighting at a heavier division 140lbs(use to fight at 135lbs)
        2. throws more punches and seems not to tire.
        3. looks bigger than the time he lose to Prescott
        4. he hurt Malignaggi more than what Cotto or Hatton have done before.

        Yet no one is crying foul.

        If Khan is clean so is Pac they both have the same trainer and conditioning coach. Both became winners under them.
        For me, id like them all to be tested. Kahn gained a bunch of points in my book when he said "id gladly take the test"

        I'm not saying that Manny is juicing, I'm just pointing out my doubts based on the suspect facts. Manny didn't help it by refusing to be tested/ 1001 excuses why he can't,shouldn't and doesn't have to test.

        Another thing is, I don't think a fighter should be downed or critisized for wanting better testing. If a fighter wants better testing I feel he should be seen a up and up fighter, and if a fighter refuses then he should know what comes with that.

        But I applaude Kahn for saying he'd do it, by him saying that my doubts are lessend but I still have them of all fighters till these test become mandatory.

        Comment

        • Mr. Herbert
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 370
          • 34
          • 13
          • 452

          #44
          I heard steroids make your 'you know what' shrink.

          Perhaps if Manny could give us before and after pictures to clear this up...

          Comment

          • brick wall
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 6480
            • 259
            • 35
            • 24,574

            #45
            Originally posted by thatnickuh
            Continuing to harp on Mayweather's motives for asking for stricter testing and making an issue out of the fact that none of his other opponents have been randomly blood tested, is making excuses for Pacquiao. None of that is relevant, you're just trying to cloud the issue. The issue is that Pacquiao is refusing random blood testing and it looks supicious. You say that you wish that he would take the tests, but do you question why he's not taking the test? Or do you just accept one his numerous excuses for not taking agreeing?
            what?? read my post again or your comprehension sucks. did i even mentioned about floyd's motives in that particular post? i only said if i have the power to dictate pac i would spank him to take the test...are you nuts? how am i questioning floyd's motives with that?

            Comment

            • cixthree
              I love Manny Pacquaio
              • Nov 2008
              • 2221
              • 152
              • 0
              • 8,387

              #46
              Originally posted by brick wall
              lol another pretty dumb speculation. i'm not defending anybody...i'm just trying to clear out your ******ity...you know the roach and peds link thing.
              Ok, so now I'm ******? Lol. Ok I can tell the diff between debating with a man and arguing with a boy.

              Comment

              • brick wall
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 6480
                • 259
                • 35
                • 24,574

                #47
                Originally posted by thatnickuh
                You say that you wish that he would take the tests, but do you question why he's not taking the test? Or do you just accept one his numerous excuses for not taking agreeing?
                what do you think is my reason why i would want him to take the test? take a good guess...

                Comment

                • AFighter4U
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 3576
                  • 63
                  • 0
                  • 9,768

                  #48
                  Look Pac was traumatized with blood testing and attributed that to this lose against Morales. If he believes that blood extracted from him will weaken him then it is so. Just like one believe there is a God the other doesn't both are not considered ****** at their stand.

                  Comment

                  • cixthree
                    I love Manny Pacquaio
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 2221
                    • 152
                    • 0
                    • 8,387

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Erik18
                    you are ******ed...
                    Only one part highlited, what about the rest of it? And name calling is for children with no debating or communication skills, did you know?

                    But in all, I have yet to have any of this proven wrong. All I get are deflections and all out speculation/assumptions or name calling, lol.
                    This is how you know that you're on to something, no legit get backs.

                    Comment

                    • brick wall
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 6480
                      • 259
                      • 35
                      • 24,574

                      #50
                      Originally posted by cixthree
                      Ok, so now I'm ******? Lol. Ok I can tell the diff between debating with a man and arguing with a boy.
                      you're ****** because you're trying to pass on speculations as facts...duh

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP