In my opinion Floyd is now an ATG top 20 lock

[TheGreatA]

Not a lock, although with a win over Pacquiao and possibly a belt at 160 he has a very good case.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

have you done the proper research to claim that? It's you opinion and your entitled to it, but can you compile a respectable top 50 greatest fighters of all time list? If not, I would suggest you stick to ranking fighters in the era YOU witnessed

I'm sure you're a big fan of SRR and Pep, a few two minutes youtube vids did the trick huh?

Actually its not that hard to compile footage, research and to actually read.

I have compiled a Top 50 you can go through my post history. Assuming a poster is not entitled to have an opinion on Pep and Srr because we didnt see them live is dumb as hell.

[Hannibal Barca]

Actually its not that hard to compile footage, research and to actually read.

I have compiled a Top 50 you can go through my post history. Assuming a poster is not entitled to have an opinion on Pep and Srr because we didnt see them live is dumb as hell.

No it isn't. But assuming you can determine an individuals tier of greatness based upon words the wind carries; that however is "dumb as hell".

[_original_]

Actually its not that hard to compile footage, research and to actually read.

I have compiled a Top 50 you can go through my post history. Assuming a poster is not entitled to have an opinion on Pep and Srr because we didnt see them live is dumb as hell.

I never said that did I? I just assumed you hadn't done the research to throw around statements like Floyd is top 25, which I was wrong for since I don't know where you're knowledge of the sport is at...my bad if I'm sounding like a snobby know it all, I've been arguing a lot lately with casual fans who know nothing about boxing LOL

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

No it isn't. But assuming you can determine an individuals tier of greatness based upon words the wind carries; that however is "dumb as hell".

That however is not what I said. Thanks though.

[AntonTheMeh]

top 16 overall and the greatest based on skill imo. pac has done more to be ranked higher in my opinion, but a win for may or pac over the other puts them in the top 5. IMO.

ray robinson
henry armstrong
muhammad ali
joe louis
sugar ray leonard
pernell whitaker
joe gans
willie pep
benny leonard
roberto duran
marvin hagler
julio cesar chavez
thomas hearns
rocky marciano
manny pacquiao
floyd mayweather

[Hannibal Barca]

That however is not what I said. Thanks though.

Explain to me where I went wrong.

[_original_]

top 16 overall and the greatest based on skill imo. pac has done more to be ranked higher in my opinion, but a win for may or pac over the other puts them in the top 5. IMO.

ray robinson
henry armstrong
muhammad ali
joe louis
sugar ray leonard
pernell whitaker
joe gans
willie pep
benny leonard
roberto duran
marvin hagler
julio cesar chavez
thomas hearns
rocky marciano
manny pacquiao
floyd mayweather

you seem to know the popular names from back then along with the obvious top 3, good for you....wack list though

[AntonTheMeh]

you seem to know the popular names from back then along with the obvious top 3, good for you....wack list though

yeah, I've never seen them fight so i put them on my list.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I never said that did I? I just assumed you hadn't done the research to throw around statements like Floyd is top 25, which I was wrong for since I don't know where you're knowledge of the sport is at...my bad if I'm sounding like a snobby know it all, I've been arguing a lot lately with casual fans who know nothing about boxing LOL

Its the big fight high. Most of these posters will all leave within a week or so...lol.