Comments Thread For: Burstein: Pacquiao's Lawsuit is a 'Shockingly ****** Case'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GRUSTLER
    Undisputed champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 14118
    • 444
    • 115
    • 20,934

    #51
    Originally posted by Dave Rado
    The OP's point was that you'd hardly expect him to say anything else.
    No because what he is saying is the truth and that is, Manny Pacquiao
    has no case.

    Comment

    • Dave Rado
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 8064
      • 266
      • 453
      • 14,460

      #52
      Originally posted by GRUSTLER
      No because what he is saying is the truth and that is, Manny Pacquiao has no case.
      The point is that even if Pacquiao did have a strong case, Shaefer's lawyer wouldn't say so.

      Comment

      • el malo
        Last Of The Mo-Ricans!
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 7298
        • 260
        • 427
        • 14,024

        #53
        this **** has been said a long time ago, THERE IS NO CASE!

        Comment

        • GRUSTLER
          Undisputed champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 14118
          • 444
          • 115
          • 20,934

          #54
          Originally posted by Dave Rado
          The point is that even if Pacquiao did have a strong case, Shaefer's lawyer wouldn't say so.
          BUT the point is, that Manny Pacquiao doesn't have a case.
          Don't have to be a lawyer to know that this case is bogus and just
          a smoke screen. Why would Burstein have to lie if he's telling the
          truth? Pacquiao has no case PERIOD.

          Comment

          • -The Glove-
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 8008
            • 328
            • 76
            • 18,685

            #55
            Hmm...so the other parties' attorney says his opponents has no case? What's he supposed to say? This is the same guy still representing Mosley against BALCO when there's videos showing Shane knew what he was doing.

            Comment

            • And Still
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 2479
              • 118
              • 32
              • 2,699

              #56
              Originally posted by Dave Rado
              The point is that even if Pacquiao did have a strong case, Shaefer's lawyer wouldn't say so.
              Yeah... he could say NOTHNG. It's not as if he had to comment.

              Comment

              • deanrw
                Mayor Ford's dealer...
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 13096
                • 1,047
                • 1,007
                • 1,860,285

                #57
                I think the lawsuit is due to the permanent stigma that got attached to Pacquiao due to it.

                Manny could take 10000 blood tests after the accusations made their rounds, but all you would hear is "Of course he is not testing positive now, because he is out of cycle". That is the damage right there. He simply cannot "prove" innocence at this point. All he can do is pass a test in a given window of time and even that proves nothing.


                Because of that I don't blame him for the lawsuit. Those accusations will shadow him for a long long time.

                Comment

                • GRUSTLER
                  Undisputed champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 14118
                  • 444
                  • 115
                  • 20,934

                  #58
                  Originally posted by deanrw
                  I think the lawsuit is due to the permanent stigma that got attached to Pacquiao due to it.

                  Manny could take 10000 blood tests after the accusations made their rounds, but all you would hear is "Of course he is not testing positive now, because he is out of cycle". That is the damage right there. He simply cannot "prove" innocence at this point. All he can do is pass a test in a given window of time and even that proves nothing.


                  Because of that I don't blame him for the lawsuit. Those accusations will shadow him for a long long time.
                  If Manny would have just agreed to the tests and made the fight
                  happen, then no one would have even questioned him AT ALL. The
                  reason people began questioning Manny is because he made up so
                  many lame excuses on why he could not take them, making him look
                  suspect. Nobody even cared what Floyd Sr was saying until Manny,
                  Freddie and Ariza started frontin. Again, Burstein said it right, Pacquiao
                  has bad advisors and I am sure we can all agree on that.

                  Comment

                  • Stuey's Revenge
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 213
                    • 14
                    • 24
                    • 6,510

                    #59
                    I think accusing a fighter of steroid usage without any proof is "Shockingly ******" !

                    Comment

                    • Kagami Taiga
                      Generation of Miracles
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 19078
                      • 703
                      • 228
                      • 40,183

                      #60
                      Originally posted by deanrw
                      I think the lawsuit is due to the permanent stigma that got attached to Pacquiao due to it.

                      Manny could take 10000 blood tests after the accusations made their rounds, but all you would hear is "Of course he is not testing positive now, because he is out of cycle". That is the damage right there. He simply cannot "prove" innocence at this point. All he can do is pass a test in a given window of time and even that proves nothing.


                      Because of that I don't blame him for the lawsuit. Those accusations will shadow him for a long long time.
                      lol, all of that is nice, but thats just how u feel. thats not at all how the common law on slander works. the guy doesnt have a strong case no matter how u feel these words will affect him. his strongest case is against the two older mayweathers and its still not clear he can win that one either.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP