Comments Thread For: Burstein: Pacquiao's Lawsuit is a 'Shockingly ****** Case'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 738
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #31
    Originally posted by M.I.C.
    They can say whatever the Phuck they want abouy Pac, this is a free country!! Maybe Pac a bit to use to the favortism of the Phillipine media.
    Does Oscar have a stake on Pacquiao? Is he not a co promoter?

    Comment

    • And Still
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 2479
      • 118
      • 32
      • 2,699

      #32
      Originally posted by M.I.C.
      They can say whatever the Phuck they want abouy Pac, this is a free country!! Maybe Pac a bit to use to the favortism of the Phillipine media.
      You know how hypersensitive the *******s are.

      Can you imagine Barack ***** officially responding to a joke by a B-list comedian.

      Their President!!
      Last edited by And Still; 04-25-2010, 01:39 PM.

      Comment

      • Pullcounter
        no guts no glory
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 42582
        • 549
        • 191
        • 49,739

        #33
        you can take someone to court for slander and libel

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 738
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #34
          I just want to know, are GBP (Oscar) the minority promoter of Manny Pacquiao?

          Comment

          • Iceta Lives
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 7178
            • 247
            • 165
            • 13,598

            #35
            If I was a judge I'd tear the lawsuit paper and throw it in the trash, because Pac's team flirted with the idea of setting up a Malinaggi fight.

            Comment

            • Iceta Lives
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 7178
              • 247
              • 165
              • 13,598

              #36
              Originally posted by Pullcounter
              of course burstein is gonna say its a ****** case. he's representing 2 defendants. winning the case isn't that big a deal. what matters is that GBP lose a promotional right to pac. that imho is what is most important.

              how ****** is GBP for expressing an opinion that a guy they are co-promoting is using steroids? that's like saying mosley is using streroids or that floyd uses illegal numbing agents for his hands.
              I don't think they outright accused Pac of taking roids to my knowledge though. They expected Mosley to take the tests, so how are they showing discrimination toward one guy?

              Comment

              • Seleção No. 13
                Noblesse oblige
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 5934
                • 280
                • 265
                • 12,426

                #37
                Originally posted by Iceta Lives
                I don't think they outright accused Pac of taking roids to my knowledge though. They expected Mosley to take the tests, so how are they showing discrimination toward one guy?
                They boycotted Pac altogether by refusing to let him fight any Golden Boy fighter unless he takes OST.

                Comment

                • Kagami Taiga
                  Generation of Miracles
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 19078
                  • 703
                  • 228
                  • 40,183

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  you can take someone to court for slander and libel
                  yea but 4 a public figure to do it is nearly impossible. they are generally not winnable suits.

                  Comment

                  • Pullcounter
                    no guts no glory
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 42582
                    • 549
                    • 191
                    • 49,739

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Iceta Lives
                    I don't think they outright accused Pac of taking roids to my knowledge though. They expected Mosley to take the tests, so how are they showing discrimination toward one guy?
                    it's their opinion that pac is on PEDs. is that what a co-promoter says about a guy they co-promote?

                    also....

                    Originally posted by jonarie
                    They boycotted Pac altogether by refusing to let him fight any Golden Boy fighter unless he takes OST.
                    sounds like showing discrimination to me.

                    Originally posted by DempseyRollin
                    yea but 4 a public figure to do it is nearly impossible. they are generally not winnable suits.
                    doesn't matter, as long as GBP loses their promotional rights to pac, it will have been worth it

                    Comment

                    • The Hate Giver
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 1217
                      • 109
                      • 41
                      • 1,373

                      #40
                      wow!!!!!!!!

                      what a suprise, the lawyer defending gbp says the lawsuit is a joke!!!!

                      what's next? Floyd comes out of the closet?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP