Hatton = "shot", Cotto = "shot", Margarito = "shot?"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • johncs08
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 614
    • 24
    • 0
    • 6,901

    #51
    how about this

    diego corales=WEIGHT DRAINED
    castillo 1st fight=robbed
    gatti=LOL WTF
    baldomir=11 loses lol..got beat by clottey til he hot DQd
    judah=been KOd b4
    delahoya=been kOD b4 by hopkins

    ITS ALWAYS EXCUSES..WHEN PAC FIGHTS,HES ALWAYS THE SMALLER MAN AND THERE ARE QUESTIONS..WHAT IF PAC GETS HIT? then the excuses came..

    Comment

    • S.G.
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 9412
      • 296
      • 635
      • 16,360

      #52
      Hatton's punch resistance was completely shot but he still looked sharp and not sluggish.

      Cotto is a bit damaged (mentally as much as physically) but he was still a perfectly good opponent.

      Margarito's punch resistance appears to be gone and he no longer has his artificial power (loaded wraps).

      Comment

      • lfc19titles
        Undisputed Champion
        • Mar 2010
        • 8731
        • 725
        • 628
        • 94,838

        #53
        Originally posted by fightfan_79
        Just wanted to know everyone's take on this issue......

        According to a good number of "fans" on NSB....Hatton was never the same after getting KOd by the ringpost.....I mean Floyd.

        Cotto was never the same after getting BTFD (beat the f**k down) by bricks...I mean Margarito.

        So now does Margarito fall under that category of "shot" since the manner in which Mosley destroyed him was....BEAUTIFUL?

        Just wanted peoples' opinions......

        IMO...Margarito is done.
        its just excuses people use to downgrades pacs win. they were not shot at all, looked how they performed, they were just outclassed

        hatton was at his premium weight and was fine

        cotto look at his fight night weigh, he was fine as well, he wasnt shot.

        its just fans who hate pac or support the above guys making ****** excuses

        margo isnt shot at all, if fighters who lose are shot then is pac shot beating all these guys? he has lost 2 times

        Comment

        • Allucard
          Undisputed Champion
          • Jun 2007
          • 5979
          • 393
          • 56
          • 12,399

          #54
          Originally posted by Siggy
          none of em are shot. hatton just wasnt that good to begin with.
          43-0 and the JWW lineal champion - Not good enough.

          Comment

          • johncs08
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 614
            • 24
            • 0
            • 6,901

            #55
            Originally posted by lfc19titles
            its just excuses people use to downgrades pacs win. they were not shot at all, looked how they performed, they were just outclassed

            hatton was at his premium weight and was fine

            cotto look at his fight night weigh, he was fine as well, he wasnt shot.

            its just fans who hate pac or support the above guys making ****** excuses

            margo isnt shot at all, if fighters who lose are shot then is pac shot beating all these guys? he has lost 2 times
            OMFG..is that shakira?

            Comment

            • AntDawg
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 1771
              • 59
              • 48
              • 8,543

              #56
              Don't you guys just love how if someone loses one time they = shot now?

              Comment

              • Pacdbest
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 4344
                • 169
                • 0
                • 10,794

                #57
                Originally posted by fightfan_79
                Just wanted to know everyone's take on this issue......

                According to a good number of "fans" on NSB....Hatton was never the same after getting KOd by the ringpost.....I mean Floyd.

                Cotto was never the same after getting BTFD (beat the f**k down) by bricks...I mean Margarito.

                So now does Margarito fall under that category of "shot" since the manner in which Mosley destroyed him was....BEAUTIFUL?

                Just wanted peoples' opinions......

                IMO...Margarito is done.
                It's better to prove them shot in the ring by Beating the hell out of them. Just like what Pac has done with DLH. Floyd won't even fight Cotto, he ducked him for years.

                JUdah was shot already after being schooled By a Journeyman Baldomir. And yet Floyd cant KO Judah. DLH's shot and yet Floyd got only an SD.

                Comment

                • shade darkar
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 6460
                  • 227
                  • 337
                  • 12,996

                  #58
                  Originally posted by fightfan_79
                  Just wanted to know everyone's take on this issue......

                  According to a good number of "fans" on NSB....Hatton was never the same after getting KOd by the ringpost.....I mean Floyd.

                  Cotto was never the same after getting BTFD (beat the f**k down) by bricks...I mean Margarito.

                  So now does Margarito fall under that category of "shot" since the manner in which Mosley destroyed him was....BEAUTIFUL?

                  Just wanted peoples' opinions......

                  IMO...Margarito is done.
                  styles make fights. i find it funny when people say hatton was shot because if you look at his fight before pac with paulie, it was actually one of his best performances. hatton lost to pac because he just isnt good enough. simple as that.

                  same with cotto, he just wasnt good enough either. pac was far too quick for them both. cotto also had a bit of a ****ty trainer. add to that that both guys are not very hard to hit either, especially hatton.

                  Comment

                  • S.G.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 9412
                    • 296
                    • 635
                    • 16,360

                    #59
                    Originally posted by shade darkar
                    styles make fights. i find it funny when people say hatton was shot because if you look at his fight before pac with paulie, it was actually one of his best performances. hatton lost to pac because he just isnt good enough. simple as that.
                    I wouldn't call Hatton's win over Paulie one of his best performances. Best wins in terms of name value, sure, but his performance stank. It was a ****ty fight and very hard to watch for all the clinching and the lack of actual boxing taking place. And Hatton even seemed to feel Paulie's power at points.

                    And what about the Lazcano fight? Hatton being shaken by an old, blown up lightweight contender?

                    Come to think of it; Hatton's chin had been on the downward slope since the Collazo fight. Mayweather appeared to put the final nail in the coffin though.

                    Comment

                    • wangkol
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 27
                      • 6
                      • 0
                      • 47

                      #60
                      Mayweather = Shot by Ellerbie in the back...now floyd got Hemorrhoids.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP