Hatton = "shot", Cotto = "shot", Margarito = "shot?"

[Pacquiao'd]

im not gonna say any of them were shot. but if anyone is gonna agrue they were on the rise and they were as prime as they were b4 their losses, that makes no sense. all of those fighters were comin off big losses, they had fights in between but nothing impressive.

it is a big difference when ur fighting a fighter on the rise than when ur fighting a fighter on a rebound. its true, i dnt think anyone can argue a fighter has the same level of confidence when they were undefeated and they are coming off losses. this is my only big knock on pac and him fighting margs without tryna get that mayweather/mosely fight would def seem like this is the type of fighter he prefers.

ownage is going down

[Siggy]

i can just imagine how a boxing board like this would be back in the day when fighters fought more often, the best fought the best and losses came more frequently, even for the really good fighters.
it'd sound like an LMFAO song "shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot...EVERYBODY's shot shot..."

[BrushMyCage]

ownage is going down

even your asian boy friend wont agree

[filibustero]

if paquiao fight him, many posters here wil call him shot fighter

[Kilrain]

Hatton recovered fine, as evidenced by his win over Malignaggi. That was probably the best ever Hatton performance in terms of how he looked, slipping punches, setting up attacks, high workrate etc. Cotto has obviously a little wear and tear on him from the Margarito fight but I think it's minimal. Because he'd always have struggled with a big strong WW like Clottey so that doesn't mean anything. And Pacquiao was always too good for him. I don't think Cotto has slowed up, he boxed very well against Pacquiao, he just got wore down as I believe Pacquiao would wear every 147 lb'er down.

[victorythagr8]

but did hatton have a Zero on his record...NO.

this was post Floyd-Ricky.

if they were so confident in manny's ability, they woudl have fought hatton and took his Zero. which they didnt.

instead, they prefer going after the easy targets who wont present a challenege

hence why they ran from shane and floyd

Now I know you are an idiot.

Guess how many fight pacquaio had above 130 when floyd took that 0 from hatton. 0

Pacquaio was still at 130 hence why he didn't fight Hatton yet. He was too busying worrying about what was Marquez, david diaz, Soto, Guzman, and Valero was doing at the time.

Now tell me this.....WOULD YOU EVEN GIVE PACQUAIO CREDIT IF HE BEAT SHANE and the NOT SAY HE DUCKED COTTO.

And also how are you hating on pacquaio for taking roid(not proven) and at the same time supporting a known ROID user.

Don't act like Shane didnt straight out ducked Paul Williams.

There is no reason why people should respect your opinion because you have 0 boxing knowledge.

I guess pacquaio avoided challenge so fighting bums like Cotto, Morrales, marquez, and Barrera should never be question. Wow pacquaio ducked shane, even though both shane and cotto are the same level of fighters and the only reason cotto fought pacquaio because they have the same promoter and ARUM didn't want to share any money with gbp out side of their lil share that the get from pacquaio. It wasnt ducking. Really shane beat a margarito who has been caught cheating and without cheating margarito is just a bum.

[Clyde Barrow]

Just wanted to know everyone's take on this issue......

According to a good number of "fans" on NSB....Hatton was never the same after getting KOd by the ringpost.....I mean Floyd.

Cotto was never the same after getting BTFD (beat the f**k down) by bricks...I mean Margarito.

So now does Margarito fall under that category of "shot" since the manner in which Mosley destroyed him was....BEAUTIFUL?

Just wanted peoples' opinions......

IMO...Margarito is done.

Margarito won't be the same fighter. He relies on his chin to make his style work.