Manny Pacquiao Or Marvin Hagler. Who's Greater?

[Left Banned Tua]

I agree with this post

EDIT: In terms of overall boxing ability and intangibles I say Hagler, but in terms of resume I say Pacman

hagler fought the greater fighters though even though it wasn't as numerous as pacquiao.

[Calilloyd]

Big Hagler fan, but id say Pac.

Pac has moved up so many weights and has fought more great fighters.

Hagler stuck at 160 and his best wins are against fighters moving up.



What Pac has done is unique.

Not true. There is nobody on Pacquiao's resume that matches up to Hearns, Leonard or even the version of Duran that Hagler fought. Hatton, Cotto, Diaz, and a shot Eric Morales or Delahoya certainly don't.

[Bennett]

Pac is greater than Hagler NOW. He could loose to 50 bums next and his accomplishments will still be there.

fucck off. troll hater---get pacyows **** outta ur mouf.

[The Noose]

he was trust me. he was so dam tough its hard to tell, but hearns hurt him. not like on ***** street hurt and remember that right hook h-bomb that stopped duran and duran was a tough muther. hearns could hurt any1.

big hagler fan here so im not ****tin on marvin, but gots to give credit where credits due thats all im sayin.

He must have been hurt a few times in his career. I think against Hearns its difficult to tell if he was genuinly hurt. He was caught by a big uppercut and looked to grab Hearns for a moment, but then seemed fine.

He has said he wasnt hurt. The commentators obviously thought he was.

Amazing how he took those shots.

[Left Banned Tua]

Not true. There is nobody on Pacquiao's resume that matches up to Hearns, Leonard or even the version of Duran that Hagler fought. Hatton, Cotto, Diaz, and a shot Eric Morales certianly don't.

he said "more great fighters".

pacquiao does have more fights against great fighters.

hagler's has the greater fighters on his resume though.

[Bennett]

Not true. There is nobody on Pacquiao's resume that matches up to Hearns, Leonard or even the version of Duran that Hagler fought. Hatton, Cotto, Diaz, and a shot Eric Morales or Delahoya certianly don't.

exactly

people or rather the sheeple have no idea on how dangerous hearns really was. nobody stopped duran like that. looked like he got killed in there.

[Calilloyd]

he said "more great fighters".

pacquiao does have more fights against great fighters.

hagler's has the greater fighters on his resume though.

The only truly great fighter Pacquiao beat was Barrera. That's only one fighter. Morales was shot and he lost to him the first time.

[Left Banned Tua]

exactly

people or rather the sheeple have no idea on how dangerous hearns really was. nobody stopped duran like that. looked like he got killed in there.

lucky punch.

duran was getting ready to pound hearn's gay ass.

[Left Banned Tua]

The only truly great fighter Pacquiao beat was Barrera. That's only one fighter. Morales was shot and he lost to him the first time.

morales is still a great fighter.

just because he was past it doesn't mean it doesn't count.



delahoya is a great fighter too. marquez can be classified as a great fighter as well depending on how you define great.

[The Noose]

Not true. There is nobody on Pacquiao's resume that matches up to Hearns, Leonard or even the version of Duran that Hagler fought. Hatton, Cotto, Diaz, and a shot Eric Morales or Delahoya certainly don't.

I consider Barrera and Morales great, Plus Hatton and Cotto were at their best weight and at one time both top ten p4p.

Ur right, no one really can match Duran Hearns and Leonard. But Duran was well past his best and fighting well above his best weight. He did brilliantly to survive for 15 rounds.

I wouldnt call Morales shot in their rematch. I could just as well say Leonard had 1 fight in 5 years and Duran was a fat lightweight.