Manny Pacquiao Or Marvin Hagler. Who's Greater?

[The Noose]

true. if pac wins against mayweather than we can talk about him being greater, but now there are too many questions. best names on his resume are all retired fighters now which means he beat them past their prime. hatton and cotto were both coming of loses

Hatton and Cotto had both won previous fights.

Duran had lost twice a year before moving up to fight Marvin, Leonard hadnt fought in 3 years.

[Left Banned Tua]

apples and oranges.

one guy dominated a division.

the other guy jumped up and down in divisions.

both guys have great resumes and fought some great fighters.

[S A M U R A I]

true. if pac wins against mayweather than we can talk about him being greater, but now there are too many questions. best names on his resume are all retired fighters now which means he beat them past their prime. hatton and cotto were both coming of loses

So what do you think of Hagler fighting a guy with 38 losses for his 45th pro fight?

Most people look back on boxing history and get all sloppy about it, but no fighter is perfect. They all have matchmakers, they avoid certain fighters, and sometimes inexcusably fight complete tomato cans.

I imagine if it was Pacquiao who fought a guy with 38 losses for his 45th fight, you wouldn't be talking nice about him like you are about Hagler.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[jrosales13]

Hagler is head and shoulders above. We can see pacquiao, really is very close to WW, so there's no excuse anymore. Pacquiao's accomplishments will forever be tarnished, untill he mans up and fight Mr. Mayweather!

You can say the same thing about Mayweather though.

[southcentralcar]

Hatton and Cotto had both won previous fights.

Duran had lost twice a year before moving up to fight Marvin, Leonard hadnt fought in 3 years.

cotto was damaged even roach said that. and hatton .. he never was that good of a fighter and had previously lost to mayweather.

[southcentralcar]

So what do you think of Hagler fighting a guy with 38 losses for his 45th pro fight?

Most people look back on boxing history and get all sloppy about it, but no fighter is perfect. They all have matchmakers, they avoid certain fighters, and sometimes inexcusably fight complete tomato cans.

I imagine if it was Pacquiao who fought a guy with 38 losses for his 45th fight, you wouldn't be talking nice about him like you are about Hagler.

pacquiao is still fighting we dont know what he will do in the future. perhaps he'll end up fighting bums and losing

[Shattered Jaw]

LMFAO at all the people just blindly saying Hagler. Probably just 'black Americans' who support Floyd and other 'black Americans'.

[Shattered Jaw]

pacquiao is still fighting we dont know what he will do in the future. perhaps he'll end up fighting bums and losing

Pac is greater than Hagler NOW. He could loose to 50 bums next and his accomplishments will still be there.

[southcentralcar]

Pac is greater than Hagler NOW. He could loose to 50 bums next and his accomplishments will still be there.

well if you say he could lose to 50 bums and would still be better than i dont have much to say. i guess even if he was on peds it wouldnt change your mind about his achievments

[Ravishing]

Pacquiao's career isn't over yet, so it's unfair to put him up with someone, who though is a legend in the sport, is obviously retired himself.

Pacquiao's got a case if anything.