Where does Wladimir Klitschko rank anong the all time HWs?
Collapse
-
-
I'm sorry, but I can't take him seriously as a top 15 or 20 all time heavyweight. He doesn't hold ONE victory over another great heavyweight, I know they aren't there for him to beat, which is not his fault at all, but who knows how good he really is?
This is why I feel the Klitschko brothers have to fight each other, it's the only way to judge how they fit in the discussion of ATG heavyweights. There isn't any other competition. If David Haye or anyone else can change that, that would be great but until further notice I would have Wlad no where higher than 25-30.Comment
-
I'd rate him as at least a top 20 all time heavy. But I don't think you can just assume he can jump to the top 10 with wins over the fighters you named. We'll have to wait and see how their careers unfold. None have established any real consistency against good fighters in my opinion, and if they were to become non en****** after Wlad I would find it very difficult in moving him any higher compared to fighters who beat men that fought more consistent contenders....if that makes sense.Comment
-
-
THE TOP 20 HEAVYWEIGHTS OF ALL TIME
1. Joe Louis
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Jack Johnson
4. George Foreman
5. Larry Holmes
6. Jack Dempsey
7. Sonny Liston
8. Jim Jeffries
9. Lennox Lewis
10. Mike Tyson
11. Rocky Marciano
12. Joe Frazier
13. Rid**** Bowe
14. Evander Holyfield
15. Sam Langford
16. Gene Tunney
17. James J. Corbett
18. Ezzard Charles
19. Jersey Joe Walcott
20. Max Schmeling
Out of this list I would only rank Wlad ahead of Tunney, Corbett and possibly Schmeling. Jmo.Comment
-
Good post!A dearth of prime great opponents doesn't keep Larry Holmes out of top 5 ATG HW discussions.
Wlad is obviously not there yet, but to say he's not top 25 is a bit absurd.
And surely you're not going to use triangle theory and a fight that Vitali was winning handidly over a 37 yo Lewis that peaked late to prove something about Wlad's abilities?
Comment
-
Spary cmon man you are better then this.What are you basing this on?
The only basis you have to come to a conclusion like that his how they perform against equal and better opposition.
To say that the division is for certain weak is to presume that the best in the division would certainly not be the best if they fought the best from different eras.
To make a claim like that is really based on personal bias and nothing else because the best current fighters can't fight the best from the past so we will never know.
Its Vitali , Wlad and no one else is on there level even my boy Haye is unproven.
The divison is not good at all. Thats not Wlads fault and he can only fight whos there but it is a weak division.Comment
-
Only ahead of those three guys? Interesting...THE TOP 20 HEAVYWEIGHTS OF ALL TIME
1. Joe Louis
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Jack Johnson
4. George Foreman
5. Larry Holmes
6. Jack Dempsey
7. Sonny Liston
8. Jim Jeffries
9. Lennox Lewis
10. Mike Tyson
11. Rocky Marciano
12. Joe Frazier
13. Rid**** Bowe
14. Evander Holyfield
15. Sam Langford
16. Gene Tunney
17. James J. Corbett
18. Ezzard Charles
19. Jersey Joe Walcott
20. Max Schmeling
Out of this list I would only rank Wlad ahead of Tunney, Corbett and possibly Schmeling. Jmo.
What is it about those three particular guys?
Comment
-
Top 25. He needs a win over another GREAT fighter thats on his level. Maybe Haye can push himself to that level.Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 03-19-2010, 03:24 AM.Comment
Comment