The overrated Bernard Hopkins

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MOTHER DUCKER
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 7402
    • 261
    • 177
    • 8,407

    #61
    Originally posted by IMDAZED
    Can you cite examples of fighters at 168 Calzaghe fought who were better than Hopkins' resume at 160? How about their body of records beyond their respective divisions?
    Like i said neither have great resumes and i gave Hopkins the edge due to name power (this is MW vs SMW). Calzaghe has a few names Eubank, Kessler, Lacy etc while Hopkins has Johnson, Jones (a loss), Tito, Oscar, Holmes..

    The guy fought the likes of Echolls, Mercado, Allen more then once as well just inflating his defenses even further why refight guys you got a mid round tko on or UD from?

    But outside of that?

    Hopkins beat Winky, Tarver and Pavlik and lost to Calzaghe
    Calzaghe beat Hopkins and Jones

    Not really much difference like i said Jones was shot to ****.. Pavlik and Winky had no business at those weights and Tarver was arguably weight drained. Note he didn't go on record to say he was but how could he? he shat on Roy Jones for doing so previous..

    Comment

    • Johnny Rebel
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2004
      • 1651
      • 79
      • 190
      • 7,877

      #62
      It gets old seeing posts that the best fighters of this generation were "overrated" or whatever excuse you can think of to demean a fighter you dislike. I dislike Hopkins as a person but to deny his (or any of the other great fighter that's hated on NSB) talent in the ring would be ridiculous since he's a great fighter...

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #63
        Originally posted by djtmal
        you hopkins ballickers crack me up...stop making excuses...he entered boxing as a lightheavy and LOST...thats HIS FAULT....you make it seem like he just decided to box without entering a ring, and took a fight for the hell of it...he LOST....THEN he decided to get serious...this ain't got nothing to do with hatton, calzaghe, etc. those cats entered a division, and stayed there win or lose, then moved up... how many fighters entered boxing in one division, then scale down 2 divisions after realizing they can't hang with equally sized, equally talented fighters...hopkins is the only one i know of...lol
        What does getting serious mean? And if a fighter can make 160 (as low as 156) for nearly 20 years what does that tell you?

        Comment

        • letsgobrady
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 6274
          • 126
          • 11
          • 12,670

          #64
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          I've never pointed to the De La Hoya win as something special. But continue to avoid the question by turning it around on the person who asked you and then jumping up and down.
          calzaghe beat mario veit,mcintyre,jimenez,byron mitchell,jeff lacy,robin reid mikkel kessler sakio bika, eubank
          hopkins beat howard eastmen,robert allen, william joppy,antwun echols.vanderpool,mercado and glen johnson
          why to u is bernards reighn at middleweight better than calzaghe's at super middleweight

          Comment

          • Suckmedry
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 5558
            • 321
            • 201
            • 7,267

            #65
            Originally posted by Johnny Rebel
            It gets old seeing posts that the best fighters of this generation were "overrated" or whatever excuse you can think of to demean a fighter you dislike. I dislike Hopkins as a person but to deny his (or any of the other great fighter that's hated on NSB) talent in the ring would be ridiculous since he's a great fighter...
            Exactly. See here is a guy with the maturity to make the distinction between the man and the fighter. Most of the guys bitching about Hop just don't like him as a man.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #66
              Originally posted by snootz86
              Like i said neither have great resumes and i gave Hopkins the edge due to name power (this is MW vs SMW). Calzaghe has a few names Eubank, Kessler, Lacy etc while Hopkins has Johnson, Jones (a loss), Tito, Oscar, Holmes..

              The guy fought the likes of Echolls, Mercado, Allen more then once as well just inflating his defenses even further why refight guys you got a mid round tko on or UD from?
              Ok then...so then why are you arguing with me if you feel Hopkins had a (slightly) better resume at 160?

              But outside of that?

              Hopkins beat Winky, Tarver and Pavlik and lost to Calzaghe
              Calzaghe beat Hopkins and Jones

              Not really much difference like i said Jones was shot to ****.. Pavlik and Winky had no business at those weights and Tarver was arguably weight drained. Note he didn't go on record to say he was but how could he? he shat on Roy Jones for doing so previous..
              Pavlik was a heavy, heavy favorite. So was Tarver who was #3 pound for pound and the undisputed king at LHW coming off wins against Jones and Johnson. And Hopkins moved up two divisions and kicked his ass. Weight drained? Don't make me laugh.

              Comment

              • MOTHER DUCKER
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 7402
                • 261
                • 177
                • 8,407

                #67
                Originally posted by Main Source
                Who told you that Tarver was drained? He felt fine before the bout. He send two of his own sparring partners home after 4 days. Tarver himself said he was in good shape - both before and AFTER the fight.

                Bernard was avoiding his left hand all night and Tarver couldn't land **** due to Bernards footwork. Watch the ****ing fight instead of talking about something you clearly can't comprehend.


                He dropped 30 odd pounds before the fight = Fact

                He couldn't comment on being weight drained as he shat all over Roy Jones for doing the same= Fact

                What fighters say i had a **** camp im in terrible shape please GTFO.. Hatton pre Pac fight was saying it was his best camp ever so don't make me laugh with Tarver said he was good oh he must have been in good shape. Boxers simply don't say that kind of **** pre fight..

                Maybe Hopkins beats him anyway who knows?

                I know Hopkins beats Trinidad 10x out of 10 doesn't change the fact that Trinidad was not a natural MW.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #68
                  Originally posted by letsgobrady
                  calzaghe beat mario veit,mcintyre,jimenez,byron mitchell,jeff lacy,robin reid mikkel kessler sakio bika, eubank
                  hopkins beat howard eastmen,robert allen, william joppy,antwun echols.vanderpool,mercado and glen johnson
                  why to u is bernards reighn at middleweight better than calzaghe's at super middleweight
                  Because Veit, McIntyre and Jimenez make Eastman, Allen and Joppy look like the dream team? Because Byron Mitchell is on the level of Keith Holmes, if not worse? Because Sakio Bika is just a contender whose shining moment came against a Contender? Who did Calzaghe beat at super middle that was as good as Tito in his prime?

                  Comment

                  • letsgobrady
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 6274
                    • 126
                    • 11
                    • 12,670

                    #69
                    Originally posted by daggum
                    kessler, eubank and roy jones fought at 154 before. hopkins fought at 156. these are great wins for a natural supermiddle and light heavy such as calzaghe? he should be ashamed.
                    154-168
                    135-160
                    which is the bigger difference?
                    what is considered oscars best weight ?147
                    what is kessler considered as? super middleweight

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #70
                      Originally posted by snootz86

                      He dropped 30 odd pounds before the fight = Fact
                      He dropped 30lbs close to every fight. FACT.

                      He couldn't comment on being weight drained as he shat all over Roy Jones for doing the same= Fact
                      He said he felt great at the weight and that he was ready to fight even a week before. FACT.

                      What fighters say i had a **** camp im in terrible shape please GTFO.. Hatton pre Pac fight was saying it was his best camp ever so don't make me laugh with Tarver said he was good oh he must have been in good shape. Boxers simply don't say that kind of **** pre fight..
                      What fighter doesn't have an excuse post-fight?

                      Maybe Hopkins beats him anyway who knows?
                      Well we know what happened when they fought. 12-0.

                      I know Hopkins beats Trinidad 10x out of 10 doesn't change the fact that Trinidad was not a natural MW.
                      And your point is?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP