Calzaghe just got 3rd best fighter of the decade by this site.
Where did Winky come?
Seriously, these polls are ****** at times, and it's even more frightening to see the poll results.
The polls might as-well always be titled,
"Which fighter do you prefer?"
Be real though Calzaghe is not the 3rd best of the decade. It's honestly crazy to have him over Hopkins. What was Mosley on that list 9th or somethign?
Calzaghe's higher just off that he cleaned out 168...Winky hasn't cleaned out any division...and Winky's best win is over a man who started at LW and best weight was WW...
Mosley's track record at 154 isn't too hot. Not sure those wins are that significant.
I would say beating Mosley twice at 154, since he lost only once there is better than beating Kessler, who is terrible. Also Annihilating Felix Trinidad is better than getting a questionable W over Hopkins.
I would say beating Mosley twice at 154, since he lost only once there is better than beating Kessler, who is terrible. Also Annihilating Felix Trinidad is better than getting a questionable W over Hopkins.
I would say beating Mosley twice at 154, since he lost only once there is better than beating Kessler, who is terrible. Also Annihilating Felix Trinidad is better than getting a questionable W over Hopkins.
Other than the controversial win over Oscar, I can't think of a significant win Mosley had at 154. Calzaghe cleaned out 168 which may not be much but is certainly a better body of work this decade.
Other than the controversial win over Oscar, I can't think of a significant win Mosley had at 154. Calzaghe cleaned out 168 which may not be much but is certainly a better body of work this decade.
Tweet
Comment