Who has defeated more fighters in their PRIME: Mayweather or Pacquiao?

[Doctor_Tenma]

A shot Morales > any prime wins for Mayweather

Bloated up Ricky Hatton is probably Mayweathers best performance and thats not saying much...

Ganero Hernandez > Shot Morales.

[Titing Kabayo]

Discussion:
Floyd >>> Pac


Poll
Pac >>> Floyd

So Pac wins.. :S

[Dynamite Kid]

Who has defeated more elite! fighters is more important.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Who has defeated more elite! fighters is more important.

You know, there were talks of Pernell Whitaker moving up to 154 and facing Norris. Think Whitaker would have beaten him?

[Nightelf]

im looking at the poll results and im actually offended lol....

man u pacfans are a funny bunch huh?

[fcastro1]

pac fought prime fighters but he is so ferocious that it makes them look shot. pacs resume ****s on floyd by a mile. more weights, more lineal, more hofs and more dominating perfmormances against elite.

[fcastro1]

btw does fighting prime bum fighters count? then floyd wins by a mile.

[Galahad]

im looking at the poll results and im actually offended lol....

man u pacfans are a funny bunch huh?

Go to your room and cry. hahahaha.

[dans]

he also had 9 losses going in, and was coming off wins against a very shot shot Gatti (RIP), judah, and before that, miguel angel rodrgiuez and aguzum? But yet some how Barrera and Cotto were shot? talk about spin

First of all, I never said Barrera and Cotto were shot. Never mentioned them at all.

But secondly,

I find it very ironic that Pacquiao fans are sitting here discrediting Floyd's win over Baldomir cause he already had nine losses.

So let me get this straight. Pacquiao has been KOed twice. Both early in his career. But we're supposed to believe that Pacquiao was not the same fighter back then, and he would never lose those fights today. Fair enough, I agree.

But then, when we're talking Floyd's resume. I bring up the fact that Baldomir had not lost in 9 years. Pac fans are trying to tell me that beating Baldomir meant nothing because he already had 9 losses. Basically telling me Baldomir was a bum.

So in conclusion, some of Pac's fans like to have their cake, and eat it too.

They want us to throw away Pac's two KO losses that were early in his career, but when we're talking about Mayweather, Baldomir was a bum because he lost nine times nine years before fighting Floyd.

Double standard much?

[letsgobrady]

PBF gets no credit because he barely beat DLH and fought Hatton at 147 with home advantage, and after having a word with the ref beforehand to look out for Hattons dirty tactics.
Pac gets credit because he mopped the floor with them in about 10 rounds less than PBF did.



He still put in good performances after losing to Marge. He had a bad day against Clottey, but that hardly means much. Everyone can have a bad day. Still no one beating Cotto though was there decisively.

he beat hatton you say with home town advantages yet hatton said floyd is better than pacquiao and believes that pacquiao can't beat floyd so you can beat yourself in the head to believe hatton had a chance at actually beatin floyd but the truth is hatton did nothing to floyd for 10 rounds and got knocked out and as far as the whole 147 thing why is it that 147 is a bad weight for hatton because collazo was givin him the buisness?

you say cotto put on a good performance after the marg fight but his fight after the marg fight was the jennings fight and alot of people were not to impressed with that fight than after that he fought clottey but to you he had a so called bad day but it seems like he had 3 bad days back to back maybe it wasn't just a bad day