Wins vs Lacy, Kessler, Jones, Hopkins, Eubank and other top 10 level contenders ranks him high and I am sure the undefeated record with 10 years of Super Middleweight "dominance" helped.
Argument against him is that his biggest wins came in the final two years of his career. Lacy, Kessler were great wins. Jones was past it. The Hopkins win was a good win, I'd honestly just say bad stylistically for Hopkins. It was actually a great win as Hopkins had recently beaten Tarver and went on to own Pavlik and Pascal.
While he may not be the first one that comes to mind for that distinction, it's not easy arguing against him. This coming from someone who wasnt't a fan of Calzaghe.
Argument against him is that his biggest wins came in the final two years of his career. Lacy, Kessler were great wins. Jones was past it. The Hopkins win was a good win, I'd honestly just say bad stylistically for Hopkins. It was actually a great win as Hopkins had recently beaten Tarver and went on to own Pavlik and Pascal.
While he may not be the first one that comes to mind for that distinction, it's not easy arguing against him. This coming from someone who wasnt't a fan of Calzaghe.
Comment