Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why haven’t we seen any new Boxers athletic as Roy Jones ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



    PED's don't automatically make you a freak of nature, you need to have the receptive genetics to go with the assistance
    You couldve just stopped here, bro.


    Comment


    • #62
      Someone has to be the best. Roy is the best.


      The future also doesnt mean more athleticism. what has really changed since the 90s? its not THAT long ago.


      besides look at something like sprinting or swimming, its been 10+ years since a lot of those records were set.they have harder PED testing than then now too which is probably the real reason those events peaked around 2010

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Gary Coleman View Post

        Roy Jones Jr. and Richard Hall both tested positive for the testosterone precursor androstenedione after Jones defeated Hall to retain his undisputed world light heavyweight championship in Indianapolis in 2000. Jones insisted his test was the result of ingesting the supplement Ripped Fuel. - ESPN

        Indiana Boxing Commissioner Jacob Hall admitted that Jones had tested "five or six times over an acceptable level".


        you could buy andro at GNC back then. who cares. EVERYONE is on PEDS

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by elfag View Post



          you could buy andro at GNC back then. who cares. EVERYONE is on PEDS
          Doesn't change the fact that he tested positive for a banned substance. 5 or 6 times over an acceptable level at that.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by The D3vil View Post

            You couldve just stopped here, bro.

            Why would I do that? If you can't understand such an incredibly basic concept, that is not my problem. That is your problem.

            You said PED's don't make you a freak of nature, when, that is EXACTLY what they do.

            Of course, they don't make everyone a freak of nature, you need to meet a basic genetic requirement first for that but that doesn't change the fact that is the literal epitome of what they do to the likes of a Roy Jones Jr.

            You are totally clueless and I recommend further revision on this topic before commenting on it again and making a total fool out of yourself.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

              Why would I do that? If you can't understand such an incredibly basic concept, that is not my problem. That is your problem.

              You said PED's don't make you a freak of nature, when, that is EXACTLY what they do.

              Of course, they don't make everyone a freak of nature, you need to meet a basic genetic requirement first for that but that doesn't change the fact that is the literal epitome of what they do to the likes of a Roy Jones Jr.

              You are totally clueless and I recommend further revision on this topic before commenting on it again and making a total fool out of yourself.
              It's your problem is that you can't seem to understand that if PEDs make you a "freak of nature", then you're not a "freak of nature"

              The phrase "freak of nature" inherently implies that it comes from nature itself, which is why like I've said 1000x, that no matter how many PEDs you give people, 99.9% of them won't be like Jones or Lesnar or LeBron, because what they have has to inherently come from NATURE, hence the term "FREAK OF NATURE"

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by The D3vil View Post

                It's your problem is that you can't seem to understand that if PEDs make you a "freak of nature", then you're not a "freak of nature"

                The phrase "freak of nature" inherently implies that it comes from nature itself, which is why like I've said 1000x, that no matter how many PEDs you give people, 99.9% of them won't be like Jones or Lesnar or LeBron, because what they have has to inherently come from NATURE, hence the term "FREAK OF NATURE"
                Right....but without PED's these athletes are not freaks of nature.

                They are genetically gifted, but that's different. And it's the PED's that are making them as freakish as they are.

                Hence, the PED's making them "freaks of nature" Or i.e unnaturally freakish for the likes of Jones, Brock Lesnar and those type of overtly freakish athletes.

                You've laughably attempted to claim PED's don't make someone a freak of nature when that is QUITE LITERALLY exactly what they do. How freakish will entirely depend on the athlete's genetic capabilities but it still doesn't change the fact that that is literally the epitome of the purpose that they serve.

                How you are lost on this, I don't even know. But like I said before, you don't have the first clue on this topic and you've made that clear well before this thread.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                  Right....but without PED's these athletes are not freaks of nature.

                  They are genetically gifted, but that's different. And it's the PED's that are making them as freakish as they are.

                  Hence, the PED's making them "freaks of nature" Or i.e unnaturally freakish for the likes of Jones, Brock Lesnar and those type of overtly freakish athletes.

                  You've laughably attempted to claim PED's don't make someone a freak of nature when that is QUITE LITERALLY exactly what they do. How freakish will entirely depend on the athlete's genetic capabilities but it still doesn't change the fact that that is literally the epitome of the purpose that they serve.

                  How you are lost on this, I don't even know. But like I said before, you don't have the first clue on this topic and you've made that clear well before this thread.
                  XZU6Prx.gif

                  Ugh, I think you're just arguing to be arguing, bro.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by The D3vil View Post

                    XZU6Prx.gif

                    Ugh, I think you're just arguing to be arguing, bro.
                    No, you just don't understand what's being said because you don't understand this topic.

                    This isn't the first time this has happened with you and undoubtedly won't be last.

                    I strongly suggest further revision before commenting on this kind of topic in future.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP