Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wilder is the Biggest SCAM in Boxing History

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wilder is the Biggest SCAM in Boxing History

    Boxing matchmakers lurk in the shadows and the build up the fighter they love, most people don't know who Bruce Trampler is, but you should.

    Finkel knew he had a guy who could punch a little with zero no chin, that's why they fed him 38 consecutive bums in a row. It was daring, it was preposterous, it was gross...but the fans today are so incredibly dumb they'll fall for anything if you package it the right way.

    The mong fans will say but...but...Ortiz. Homeskillet, Ortiz was 52 years old, facts and his record is dogwank.

    Fighters like Alex Stewart, Ray Mercer, even fledgings like Bert Cooper would have had Wilder in their knockout reels...lifeless and languid staring up at the fuzzy place where knocked out people go lmao.

    You got to hand it to Finkel and the boys, they knew what they had and created this knockout artist mystique with a lump of poop. The history books and historians will remember them, not Wilder.

    At the end of the day if you fell for it, shame on you. Everytime you look in the mirror know this - YDKSAB.

    Maybe try macrame or basket weaving, get a hobby - anything - other than boxing....time to go now. Good day to you...

  • #2
    While I don't necessarily disagree with you about most of what you said; I happened to believe Wilder was always a well-managed face with an equalizer, for instance, and never a master boxer. But, I watched some of his fights regardless, because they almost always promised to be entertaining, and they usually were. That's the issue I take here: what is this insistence on driving a wedge between people who watch boxing for the sport, the craft, and the science, and those who watch it for mere entertainment? Do the two need to be separated? I'm not just asking you specifically, but I see it a lot here. If anything, keeping the two camps together is what sparks debate and necessitates the need for a forum to begin with, and if the die hards ran out all of the casual watchers, or vice versa, wouldn't that division more or less spill over into boxing and bring about piss poor fights?

    I'm genuinely curious.

    But I see nothing wrong with enjoying a Wilder fight, whether or not you're a casual viewer or a historian.
    Legends456 Legends456 likes this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Joseph View Post
      While I don't necessarily disagree with you about most of what you said; I happened to believe Wilder was always a well-managed face with an equalizer, for instance, and never a master boxer. But, I watched some of his fights regardless, because they almost always promised to be entertaining, and they usually were. That's the issue I take here: what is this insistence on driving a wedge between people who watch boxing for the sport, the craft, and the science, and those who watch it for mere entertainment? Do the two need to be separated? I'm not just asking you specifically, but I see it a lot here. If anything, keeping the two camps together is what sparks debate and necessitates the need for a forum to begin with, and if the die hards ran out all of the casual watchers, or vice versa, wouldn't that division more or less spill over into boxing and bring about piss poor fights?

      I'm genuinely curious.

      But I see nothing wrong with enjoying a Wilder fight, whether or not you're a casual viewer or a historian.
      If you like Boca Burgers and not the real thing, shame on you. If you like men in dresses instead of women, again - shame on you. Boxing fans should like the REAL thing, not some fakery.

      If you're a fan of violence, maybe bum fights or mma is your thing. Boxing fans are here for one reason only: the Sweet Science.

      Casuals vs die hards have nothing to do with what I'm saying. Being a casual doesn't mean you like Barnum & Baileys 3 Ring ****haus Circus.

      The wedge is this: GET OUT. Nobody wants people here that want to make a bum a god. It's fake, and I don't like fake, none of US should...end of.

      What's wrong is making Wilder into somehting he's not, facts. Wilder is a scam, always was - always will be. He's NOT the hardest puncher in boxing history, he's the biggest scam in boxing history. You're welcome.

      Comment


      • #4
        No lies detected in the OP. Biggest fraud in the history of boxing. The US boxing media who helped perpetrate this scam should be ashamed of themselves.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by War Room View Post
          Boxing matchmakers lurk in the shadows and the build up the fighter they love, most people don't know who Bruce Trampler is, but you should.

          Finkel knew he had a guy who could punch a little with zero no chin, that's why they fed him 38 consecutive bums in a row. It was daring, it was preposterous, it was gross...but the fans today are so incredibly dumb they'll fall for anything if you package it the right way.

          The mong fans will say but...but...Ortiz. Homeskillet, Ortiz was 52 years old, facts and his record is dogwank.

          Fighters like Alex Stewart, Ray Mercer, even fledgings like Bert Cooper would have had Wilder in their knockout reels...lifeless and languid staring up at the fuzzy place where knocked out people go lmao.

          You got to hand it to Finkel and the boys, they knew what they had and created this knockout artist mystique with a lump of poop. The history books and historians will remember them, not Wilder.

          At the end of the day if you fell for it, shame on you. Everytime you look in the mirror know this - YDKSAB.

          Maybe try macrame or basket weaving, get a hobby - anything - other than boxing....time to go now. Good day to you...
          Ortiz was not a bum, and he could hit like a truck. And Wilder recovered

          Comment


          • #6
            If Wilder is such a can and His power is overrated

            Why can't the other cans have 42 knockouts in 43 fights?

            Name another fighter that soley won by One shot. He is the hardest puncher ever.
            Willow The Wisp Willow The Wisp likes this.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by automaton89 View Post

              Ortiz was not a bum, and he could hit like a truck. And Wilder recovered
              Ortiz has never beaten anyone worth a ****.
              charliepaerker charliepaerker likes this.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by automaton89 View Post
                If Wilder is such a can and His power is overrated

                Why can't the other cans have 42 knockouts in 43 fights?

                Name another fighter that soley won by One shot. He is the hardest puncher ever.
                Hardest puncher ever my ass.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by automaton89 View Post
                  If Wilder is such a can and His power is overrated

                  Why can't the other cans have 42 knockouts in 43 fights?

                  Name another fighter that soley won by One shot. He is the hardest puncher ever.
                  Because they are matched tougher, earlier
                  Damn Wicked Damn Wicked likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    People are underestimating how much the trilogy with Fury took out of Wilder.

                    And vice versa, Fury took some permanent damage in those fights too. Although to a lesser extent.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP