Is the IBF planning to strip Usyk ?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eco1
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2015
    • 9952
    • 1,715
    • 8,552
    • 71,221

    #1

    Is the IBF planning to strip Usyk ?




    I say F the IBF
  • anonymous2.0
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2012
    • 11121
    • 1,853
    • 7
    • 75,058

    #2
    On one hand the IBF has spoiled more than one unification/big fight with how ironclad they enforce mandatory fights and such. On the other hand they ensure that their mandatory fighter gets a shot at the title, which is more than can be said about the other orgs.

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 69275
      • 9,488
      • 7,834
      • 287,568

      #3
      It looks that way. How fucking ****** would that be?

      Comment

      • famicommander
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2018
        • 9907
        • 5,462
        • 1
        • 49,546

        #4
        Almost as ****** as when they stripped Opetaia for taking a stay-busy fight while his mandatory was injured.

        Comment

        • anonymous2.0
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2012
          • 11121
          • 1,853
          • 7
          • 75,058

          #5
          Originally posted by famicommander
          Almost as ****** as when they stripped Opetaia for taking a stay-busy fight while his mandatory was injured.
          I thought Opetaia's was a money case, the Saud's made an offer so good it was worthwhile to drop the belt.

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 48371
            • 4,778
            • 266
            • 104,043

            #6
            This was known.

            Because of the two fight deal, it means the winner can't fight the mandatory obligation.

            Comment

            • Eff Pandas
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2012
              • 52131
              • 3,624
              • 2,147
              • 1,635,919

              #7
              Yes & this why I care about #1 not belts, unified or undisputed. Being #1 is skill based, being undisputed is politics & business.

              Comment

              • sbbigmike
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2012
                • 1986
                • 157
                • 38
                • 24,971

                #8
                No cap Usyk doesn't really deserve to be an undisputed champ after getting thoroughly outclassed 7 rounds straight like that...he didn't deserve the nod at all fury was styling n profiling

                Comment

                • Toffee
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2018
                  • 7198
                  • 2,489
                  • 74
                  • 62,824

                  #9
                  Originally posted by anonymous2.0
                  On one hand the IBF has spoiled more than one unification/big fight with how ironclad they enforce mandatory fights and such. On the other hand they ensure that their mandatory fighter gets a shot at the title, which is more than can be said about the other orgs.
                  It's a real shame.

                  But we've had a history of champions avoiding reasonable challengers. To that end we need the orgs to actually enforce their rules.

                  ​​​​​​

                  Comment

                  • famicommander
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2018
                    • 9907
                    • 5,462
                    • 1
                    • 49,546

                    #10
                    Originally posted by anonymous2.0

                    I thought Opetaia's was a money case, the Saud's made an offer so good it was worthwhile to drop the belt.
                    The IBF didn't want to let Opetaia take two consecutive non-mandatory fights. He wanted to fight Briedis on that date but Briedis wasn't ready, so he took a career high payday for a stay busy fight, got stripped, then still fought Briedis when Briedis was healthy anyway.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP