Comments Thread For: Jaron 'Boots' Ennis Files Lawsuit Against NOW Boxing, Seeking Release And Judgment In Excess Of $1,000,000

[IronDanHamza]

Hey everyone, I think this poster is actually Boots Ennis!!!!

He doesnt want to do any work or put forth any effort, he just wants someone else to hand it to him. LOLOL

Not really how it works.

You've made the claim there so the burden of proof is on you to provide the evidence that it's true, not him.

If there's a source for what you're claiming then you should provide it.

I wasn't aware Ennis avoided Crawford so I'd like to see this source as well.

[Teetotaler69]

Who TF are you to call any man who places his life on the line even in sparring for entertainment a bum? You keyboard commandos make me laugh. While you sit there with fat little Cheeto fingers and the glow of orange dust masking your chubby little cheeks all warm from the confines of your basement. You have the audacity to call any professional boxer a bum?

Lace em up commando

Lmfao man stfu you clowns are so corny with that shlt. "Dey put days life oN dA Line Doe!" Nobody forcing his bltchass. Acting like he's going to war or someshlt

[Boxingfanatic75]

Lmfao man stfu you clowns are so corny with that shlt. "Dey put days life oN dA Line Doe!" Nobody forcing his bltchass. Acting like he's going to war or someshlt

Are you mentally stunted? Below the spectrum? Hey, dummy, IQ Sub 50, newsflash servant, boxers get hit in the head repeatedly during sparring and fights. Any person who gets clobbered in the head repeatedly as their job is at risk of death. Period, end of story. For you to call said person a “bum” from the confines of mommy’s basement is the pot calling the kettle black. No one said one word of war. Not that you’d know one thing about that either. Now take your L and move along kiddo. My IQ is dropping every minute I engage in conversation with you.

[Teetotaler69]

Not really how it works.

You've made the claim there so the burden of proof is on you to provide the evidence that it's true, not him.

If there's a source for what you're claiming then you should provide it.

I wasn't aware Ennis avoided Crawford so I'd like to see this source as well.

Bozo ennis said it in a tweet and can't find it but the quote is in the article

https://www.google.com/amp/s/3kingsb...cts-blk/%3famp

Loyal to a network who didn't even have fights or dates for him lmfao they didn't want the fight point blank

[Bullrider]

They said they're loyal to Showtime, yet Espinoza only provided them 3 fights since the signing in 2022. Which means SHO is short of 3 fights, 4 if you like. So why aren't they suing Showtime?

[OnePunch]

Not really how it works.

You've made the claim there so the burden of proof is on you to provide the evidence that it's true, not him.

If there's a source for what you're claiming then you should provide it.

I wasn't aware Ennis avoided Crawford so I'd like to see this source as well.

Yes, thats exactly how it works. If I tell you that 2+2=4, I don't need to send you a link to a math site to prove it, as its common knowledge. you can either believe it, dont believe it, or research it yourself.

The bigger problem with these debates though is people (like Joseph) take it SOOOO personal. I dont know the Ennis kid. He may be fearless. I dont know. What I DO know is that HIS TEAM was offered the chance to negotiate a Crawford fight TWICE, and both times it was rejected. One time his pops turned it down, and the other time it could have been his pops, or this wack promoter, or Cameron, or whoever. All I know is that they refused negotiations both times. This has been widely reported, and in addition to media reports a good friend of mine got it directly from Bomac, and his word is definitely good enough for me.

So no, I will not spend a half hour or however long searching random sites trying to find the old stories from a year or 2 ago. I already know what I need to know to form my opinion. And anyone else is free to believe whatever they like. But in the case of Joseph, I suspect that Ennis himself could go on TV and admit it, and Joseph would still be like "they makin him say all that, he didnt really duck". So there just isnt any point it trying to have a rational conversation with someone like him........

[IronDanHamza]

Yes, thats exactly how it works. If I tell you that 2+2=4, I don't need to send you a link to a math site to prove it, as its common knowledge. you can either believe it, dont believe it, or research it yourself.

The bigger problem with these debates though is people (like Joseph) take it SOOOO personal. I dont know the Ennis kid. He may be fearless. I dont know. What I DO know is that HIS TEAM was offered the chance to negotiate a Crawford fight TWICE, and both times it was rejected. One time his pops turned it down, and the other time it could have been his pops, or this wack promoter, or Cameron, or whoever. All I know is that they refused negotiations both times. This has been widely reported, and in addition to media reports a good friend of mine got it directly from Bomac, and his word is definitely good enough for me.

So no, I will not spend a half hour or however long searching random sites trying to find the old stories from a year or 2 ago. I already know what I need to know to form my opinion. And anyone else is free to believe whatever they like. But in the case of Joseph, I suspect that Ennis himself could go on TV and admit it, and Joseph would still be like "they makin him say all that, he didnt really duck". So there just isnt any point it trying to have a rational conversation with someone like him........

I'm not sure you understand what the burden of proof is.

No one is saying what you're saying is untrue, but if you are making the claim, which you are, then the onus is on you to provide the evidence as to why it's true.

That's just how claims work, if you make a claim then the burden of proof is on you to prove as to why what you're claiming is true. It's not on the other person dis*****g your claim to prove it. That would be nonsensicial.

[joseph5620]

Yes, thats exactly how it works. If I tell you that 2+2=4, I don't need to send you a link to a math site to prove it, as its common knowledge. you can either believe it, dont believe it, or research it yourself.

The bigger problem with these debates though is people (like Joseph) take it SOOOO personal. I dont know the Ennis kid. He may be fearless. I dont know. What I DO know is that HIS TEAM was offered the chance to negotiate a Crawford fight TWICE, and both times it was rejected. One time his pops turned it down, and the other time it could have been his pops, or this wack promoter, or Cameron, or whoever. All I know is that they refused negotiations both times. This has been widely reported, and in addition to media reports a good friend of mine got it directly from Bomac, and his word is definitely good enough for me.

So no, I will not spend a half hour or however long searching random sites trying to find the old stories from a year or 2 ago. I already know what I need to know to form my opinion. And anyone else is free to believe whatever they like. But in the case of Joseph, I suspect that Ennis himself could go on TV and admit it, and Joseph would still be like "they makin him say all that, he didnt really duck". So there just isnt any point it trying to have a rational conversation with someone like him........

You could have saved yourself a lot of time by saying you don't have anything to validate what you claimed.


There is nothing personal about this for me. Don't project your personal feelings and claim they're my feelings.

When I see accusations I want to see evidence and sources. I'm not going to accept something as a fact just because you posted it on a boxing website. That's not how information is verified. "A friend of a friend of mine said it " LOL. You have nothing credible to back up what you claimed and it's obvious.

[OnePunch]

I'm not sure you understand what the burden of proof is.

No one is saying what you're saying is untrue, but if you are making the claim, which you are, then the onus is on you to provide the evidence as to why it's true.

That's just how claims work, if you make a claim then the burden of proof is on you to prove as to why what you're claiming is true. It's not on the other person dis*****g your claim to prove it. That would be nonsensicial.

can you post links to the source that dictates how "claims" work? Just because YOU say thats how claims work, well you need to validate that statement with proof.......

[OnePunch]

You could have saved yourself a lot of time by saying you don't have anything to validate what you claimed.


There is nothing personal about this for me. Don't project your personal feelings and claim they're my feelings.

When I see accusations I want to see evidence and sources. I'm not going to accept something as a fact just because you posted it on a boxing website. That's not how information is verified. "A friend of a friend of mine said it " LOL. You have nothing credible to back up what you claimed and it's obvious.

this took about 10 seconds. I'm surprised nobody has taught you how to do google searches. They are easy, even for someone with the obvious "challenges" that you have.


https://3kingsboxing.com/team-ennis-...e-rejects-blk/


5 different excuses for Ennis pops turning it down in 3...... 2......1.......


but...but... but..... it was BLK.......

but..... but..... but....... showtime

but.....but.....but...... unreliable site.......

but..... but..... but.... loyalty doe

but.... but..... but..... that was his pops not him!!!......


you will now flip your position from "HE NEVER TURNED IT DOWN!!!" to "HE TURNED IT DOWN BECAUSE.........."


too predictable........