Comments Thread For: Jaron 'Boots' Ennis Files Lawsuit Against NOW Boxing, Seeking Release And Judgment In Excess Of $1,000,000

[OnePunch]

You have plenty of time considering your company hasn't been active since 2011.

yeah, its called "retiring". You might do the same one day........

[MulaKO]

That's your evidence? Because Bozy Ennis wanted to work with Showtime and not BLK prime?


You would be better off just saying your lied at this point.

Whatever "challenges" you think I have are not nearly as challenging as what your lame, defunct, or non-existent boxing promotional company have. Bozy Ennis is clearly a lot smarter and successful than you've ever in the boxing business.

Everyone check out the big brain on Brad lmao
Ao everyone but yourself are wrong ?

I have one question ; how the fugh do you live with yourself ?
Must be truly hard and very demanding
Have a nice day and please don’t waste any of my time as I have told you before life is just to damn short to deal with ignorance

[OnePunch]

Again, the legal definition was also provided to offer further clarity on what the burden of proof is and where it applies, it makes no difference as to where the burden of proof lies which is always with the claimaint. That goes for a court of law, an internet forum, or at a Barbeque. That's just how the burden of proof works.



Of course. That is standard practice and procedure.

If someone makes a claim, the burden of proof is on them to provide evidence as to why it's true.

It's not a matter of demanding proof, it's simply just the burden of proof when making a claim.

So then if I say "I'm hungry", I need to make an appointment with a gastrologist, and get a stomach scan for my claim to have any validity?

Got it.


And I noticed you had no comment about Joseph immediately trying to downplay the link to the interview where Ennis pops admits to rejecting negotiations for a Crawford fight. As expected.....

[IronDanHamza]

So then if I say "I'm hungry", I need to make an appointment with a gastrologist, and get a stomach scan for my claim to have any validity?

Got it.


And I noticed you had no comment about Joseph immediately trying to downplay the link to the interview where Ennis pops admits to rejecting negotiations for a Crawford fight. As expected.....

No, because that's not a claim, that is a statement.

If you said something like; "Did you know the reason our bodies get hungry is because there is a hunger fairy that strikes you without looking?", Then that would be a claim therefore the burden of proof would be on you to provide evidence as to why that is true.

I haven't read the link, like I said the next step in this kind of discussion would be to unpack the evidence to see how valid it is and if it substantiates your claim of "Ennis ducked Crawford".

[joseph5620]

Everyone check out the big brain on Brad lmao
Ao everyone but yourself are wrong ?

I have one question ; how the fugh do you live with yourself ?
Must be truly hard and very demanding
Have a nice day and please don’t waste any of my time as I have told you before life is just to damn short to deal with ignorance

You've said this in 2 or 3 post already yet you keep quoting me. Even the comments not directed to you. So you can stop pretending that you're important and have better things to do.

[joseph5620]

So then if I say "I'm hungry", I need to make an appointment with a gastrologist, and get a stomach scan for my claim to have any validity?

Got it.


And I noticed you had no comment about Joseph immediately trying to downplay the link to the interview where Ennis pops admits to rejecting negotiations for a Crawford fight. As expected.....

That's a lie. According to the link Bozy Ennis wanted BLK prime to negotiate though Showtime because his son was obligated to three fights on Showtime. BLK prime didn't want to do that.

That's a far different and far more complex than "Ennis ducked Crawford."

[MulaKO]

You've said this in 2 or 3 post already yet you keep quoting me. Even the comments not directed to you. So you can stop pretending that you're important and have better things to do.

Boots still avoided Bud deal with it
Have a great day Boots

[OnePunch]

No, because that's not a claim, that is a statement.

If you said something like; "Did you know the reason our bodies get hungry is because there is a hunger fairy that strikes you without looking?", Then that would be a claim therefore the burden of proof would be on you to provide evidence as to why that is true.

I haven't read the link, like I said the next step in this kind of discussion would be to unpack the evidence to see how valid it is and if it substantiates your claim of "Ennis ducked Crawford".

Now you're making it opinion vs fact.


I never claimed that Ennis "ducked" Crawford. I dont use that term in this case, because I dont know that it was a "duck". Maybe he did duck him, maybe he didnt. I dont know. What I said was that on 2 occasions, offers were made to Ennis team to commence negotiations for a Crawford fight, and on both occasions, those overtures were rejected. That is what I said.

I dont use the term "duck", because I dont know the specifics of the conversation. Could have been a bad offer, or bad terms, could have been his team was going a different direction, there are a number of valid reasons one might pass on a fight. But usually one would at least enter negotiations to see what the numbers are. Ennis team did not do that, for whatever reason.

But Joesph is claiming that there never were any attempts to offer Ennis the Crawford fight, which is just factually incorrect.

[joseph5620]

Boots still avoided Bud deal with it
Have a great day Boots

Yeah that's about the fourth time you've said that and you're still here. That speaks for itself.

[IronDanHamza]

Now you're making it opinion vs fact.


I never claimed that Ennis "ducked" Crawford. I dont use that term in this case, because I dont know that it was a "duck". Maybe he did duck him, maybe he didnt. I dont know. What I said was that on 2 occasions, offers were made to Ennis team to commence negotiations for a Crawford fight, and on both occasions, those overtures were rejected. That is what I said.

I dont use the term "duck", because I dont know the specifics of the conversation. Could have been a bad offer, or bad terms, could have been his team was going a different direction, there are a number of valid reasons one might pass on a fight. But usually one would at least enter negotiations to see what the numbers are. Ennis team did not do that, for whatever reason.

But Joesph is claiming that there never were any attempts to offer Ennis the Crawford fight, which is just factually incorrect.

I'm not making it opinion vs fact.

When evidence is presented, the next step is to analyse is and see if it's valid and substantiates the claim. Then if it does, your claim is valid. If it doesn't, it's not.

For example if I was to claim Rid**** Bowe ducked Lennox Lewis, the burden of proof is on me to provide evidence to why that is true to which I can provide the date that he vacated his WBC belt publicly so he didn't have to fight him. That's it, cut and dry.

I don't know the details surrounding this, but if an offer was made to Ennis from Crawford's team and they were turned down like you claim then I'm sure there's sources for that.