Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Calzaghe fought at MW Hop would never have been champ

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by lparm View Post
    Joe was sloppy in that fight but outlanded Bika by a big margin. The only reasons it looked close to the haters is because Joe tried to rough Bika up against his normal style and Bika turned spoiler and used dirty tactics to back Calzaghe up a few times. Was it enough for Bika to win? Well if you're on the pipe like a few haters I guess they think it was.
    Yeah, the fight wasn't even close. Bika used every trick in the book to make it as dirty as possible but still clearly lost.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

    Comment


    • Originally posted by lparm View Post
      Just for fun

      Calzaghe vs Bika

      judge: Jose Rivera 117-110 | judge: John Lawson 117-110 | judge: Phil Edwards 116-111
      Yeah a messy fight, but up until the other day I never heard this bout's scoring being questioned. I guess Kessler beat Calzaghe too. Actually, I heard that one before now that I think of it lol

      Comment


      • What clowns. Calzaghe wouldn't have done **** to Hopkins.

        Comment


        • Joe gets hits much in his prime and Bernard has higher punch output in his prime.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Chev Chelois View Post
            Joe gets hits much in his prime and Bernard has higher punch output in his prime.
            Hopkins also didn't have anything close to what his defense is now back in the 90's. You see Hop now and think he's always had a tight defense that's not true. He was alot more open to shots when he was younger. I would say you're new to the sport but instead of using that ****bag line I'd say you just haven't seen much of the early Hop.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by lparm View Post
              Hopkins also didn't have anything close to what his defense is now back in the 90's. You see Hop now and think he's always had a tight defense that's not true. He was alot more open to shots when he was younger. I would say you're new to the sport but instead of using that ****bag line I'd say you just haven't seen much of the early Hop.
              Oh, really? How do you know about that?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by lparm View Post
                Hopkins also didn't have anything close to what his defense is now back in the 90's. You see Hop now and think he's always had a tight defense that's not true. He was alot more open to shots when he was younger. I would say you're new to the sport but instead of using that ****bag line I'd say you just haven't seen much of the early Hop.
                Hs defense was just as good back then, and I have seen ALL of his fights.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by street bully View Post
                  Hs defense was just as good back then, and I have seen ALL of his fights.
                  Ummmm then rewatch his earlier fights would be my suggestion.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by lparm View Post
                    Ummmm then rewatch his earlier fights would be my suggestion.
                    You were funny in the beginning, but you are just getting annoying now. Calzaghe is barley on and old Hopkins' level let alone a young version.

                    Comment


                    • Hopkins' style back then was completely different. Look at the Johnson fight -- his output was high. He didn't use the same type of defense back then.



                      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP