Prime Floyd vs. This Version of Crawford, who wins?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -GDS-
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 1975
    • 52
    • 28
    • 9,901

    #61
    Originally posted by satiev1

    de la hoya wasn't in his prime when he fought mayweather. He was at the tail end of his career.
    Based off of what? 34, looked good, trained with Mosley. Floyd was just better.

    Comment

    • Joe Beamish
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2014
      • 3475
      • 157
      • 42
      • 30,582

      #62
      Originally posted by satiev1

      de la hoya wasn't in his prime when he fought mayweather. He was at the tail end of his career.
      Correct. Oscar had lost 2 of his previous 4 fights.

      Comment

      • buddyr
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2014
        • 5041
        • 1,288
        • 350
        • 34,653

        #63
        Floyd entered 147 at 29 years old. Floyd struggled with quick fighters at the weight with power and stamina. I can't say at the moment without further examination, but Floyd is a counter puncher too with sharp punches. He doesn't reach and leave himself exposed. At 135, Floyd beats him. There is no doubt in my mind in that. At 147, We're talking 30 year old Crawford against 30 year old floyd and even this 35 year old version would give him problems. I do know this much, a 26 year old Tito isn't losing to a 35 year old welterweight.

        Comment

        • ReggieKray
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2019
          • 1728
          • 312
          • 468
          • 23,706

          #64
          Close but Mayweathers defense tho.

          Comment

          • billeau2
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2012
            • 27641
            • 6,397
            • 14,933
            • 339,839

            #65
            Originally posted by Gate keeper
            And that's the problem with not ever fighting an elite fighter in their prime. We have no idea how Floyd would look against someone like a Crawford. Floyd's largely a mystery at that scale. It's a tough fight but I say Crawford because he's proven himself now against an elite prime fighter.
            Absolutely! Its also the problem with how Floyd handled fighting up. Thing is, at 130-135 Floyd was on a short list. I don't see it at welter. I do see Terrance as perhaps being on a short list at this weight, time will tell.

            Comment

            • billeau2
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2012
              • 27641
              • 6,397
              • 14,933
              • 339,839

              #66
              Originally posted by elfag
              There were two things that gave floyd his hardest fights and one that gave him his easiest fights.

              He lost most rounds to applied pressure from JLC and maidana.

              He lost the next most rounds to jabs from DLH, Zab and Cotto.

              He had the easiest fights with Canelo and Marquez who tried to box and counter with him.


              If crawford tries to box and counter floyd he will get taken to school. If he can work the jab well then that could win him some rounds. End of the day I pick floyd comfortably.
              You really think Crawford would try to counter and box Floyd? Crawford adapts in the ring and becomes a pressure fighter, a viscious finisher and applies pressure, probably as well as anyone Floyd fought, definitely at Welter. At Welter I give it to CRawford, at 130-135 Floyd was on the ATG short list, I give it to Floyd.

              Comment

              • Southpawology
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2010
                • 12697
                • 1,647
                • 1,256
                • 88,940

                #67
                Originally posted by Legends456

                That’s the same thing people were saying about Spence before this fight. I rest my case.


                Spence isnt a defensive wizard. Manny Pac a high octaine offesnive wizard couldnt beat down floyd cmon.

                Comment

                • Legends456
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2019
                  • 1353
                  • 160
                  • 949
                  • 52,257

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Southpawology



                  Spence isnt a defensive wizard. Manny Pac a high octaine offesnive wizard couldnt beat down floyd cmon.
                  Pacquiao wasn’t close to Spence’s level, let alone Crawford’s.

                  Comment

                  • Legendary Hater
                    SKULLSPLITTER - The CEO
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 823
                    • 109
                    • 174
                    • 11,172

                    #69
                    Mayweather wins 2 out of 3 bouts against Crawford... if Crawford moves up and dominates again, this mythical matchup becomes a coin flip.

                    Comment

                    • ELPacman
                      LEGENDARY
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Apr 2004
                      • 10786
                      • 1,957
                      • 151
                      • 34,372

                      #70
                      So funny. So those who pick Floyd to win? How do you see it going? Obviously not by KO. Just another pitty pat, jab jab, occasional right hand. Off to the paid off judges we go. LAME.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP