first of all IN BOXING, when a person is bigger it is based on WEIGHT. Not height and reach. So I don't know why you are supporting his flawed logic. He made the statement that Floyd was bigger than 35 of his opponents..but he did NOT write who those 35 fighters were he named 12 guys that Floyd was "bigger" than, but in doing so he used that same flawed logic...the logic that height and reach makes a fighter "bigger" than another. With that flawed logic, one must agree that Paul Williams is "BIGGER" than Mike Tyson....NO, I don't think so
As I said, he was way off in pointing out who Floyd was "bigger" than,...do you care to name the 35 fighters that Floyd was "biggger" than??
As I said, he was way off in pointing out who Floyd was "bigger" than,...do you care to name the 35 fighters that Floyd was "biggger" than??
hey Cwebb, BoxingS is just 2 guys off, he drove his point well. admit it!!
Comment