This is beyond obvious. The winner of the fight is the undisputed champion. If that's Usyk, he's the first double undisputed champion in the four belt era (all due respect to Claressa Shields, but women's boxing isn't a deep pool of talent), undefeated, and the victor of a true David v Goliath story. Anyone who thinks he's not going to be a superstar if he beats Tyson Fury is an idiot. And anyone who thinks that Fury is still going to be a big deal if he loses to "the middleweight" is an idiot.
And let's remember Tyson Fury was stripped of the IBF belt for ducking his mandatory, and only missed being stripped of the others for failing a drug test because he vacated before they could strip him.
The loser has nothing, not even a mandatory slot. No bargaining power outside the rematch clause, which Fury's team insisted on to begin with. Why would the loser be entitled to 50? Flip the script. Suppose Fury wins. Should Usyk be entitled to 50 in the second fight after losing when he was only worth 30 in the first fight as an undefeated champion holding the Ring, WBA, WBO, and IBF belts?
Here's the multimillion dollar question. Usyk wants 70/30 to the winner. If Fury wins, he gets 70 in both fights. This only becomes an issue if he's afraid he loses. So why wouldn't Fury take that UNLESS he's afraid of Usyk. Why insist that Usyk should get 50 after he beats Usyk the first time, when he only gave Usyk 30 for the first fight?
If you want to make this about money, it's downright ****** for Fury to insist on a smaller cut for himself. He only loses money if he loses to Usyk too.
And let's remember Tyson Fury was stripped of the IBF belt for ducking his mandatory, and only missed being stripped of the others for failing a drug test because he vacated before they could strip him.
The loser has nothing, not even a mandatory slot. No bargaining power outside the rematch clause, which Fury's team insisted on to begin with. Why would the loser be entitled to 50? Flip the script. Suppose Fury wins. Should Usyk be entitled to 50 in the second fight after losing when he was only worth 30 in the first fight as an undefeated champion holding the Ring, WBA, WBO, and IBF belts?
Here's the multimillion dollar question. Usyk wants 70/30 to the winner. If Fury wins, he gets 70 in both fights. This only becomes an issue if he's afraid he loses. So why wouldn't Fury take that UNLESS he's afraid of Usyk. Why insist that Usyk should get 50 after he beats Usyk the first time, when he only gave Usyk 30 for the first fight?
If you want to make this about money, it's downright ****** for Fury to insist on a smaller cut for himself. He only loses money if he loses to Usyk too.
Comment