The anti-Hearn idiots are TERRIBLE for boxing.
Collapse
-
Yep Hearn, matchroom and DAZN are a threat to the f4ggy business models of deception and duckers that Bob and Al are trying to sc**** by with these days.
Hearn isn't a threat to anyone in America. You UK fanboys don't understand this market at all (neither does Hearn).
People **** on Hearn because he's a pathological liar and people catch him in lies all the time. He's got you UK fanboys totally brainwashed. For a normal person who isn't obsessed with Joshua, it's very easy to see that Hearn is lying all the time.
Shill away Susan but you know it seeing as you are some chit hot business legend.Last edited by DaNeutral.; 01-01-2022, 11:01 AM.Comment
-
I would hold him to the same standard if he was at the same standard.
This is bullish-t. Hearn does the exact same thing as anyone else but Brits like you and Earl give him cover.
Where is Andrade v GGG unification? Oh yeah there both fighting bums instead of each other so neither loses before Canelo. Bivol has fought bums while waiting for Canelo. But you call out Ericans for ducking. Lmfao.
All this is is your anti American bias coming through. Hold your British countryman to the same standard you hold Americans.Comment
-
damn this has to be ppv!!!! move over the paul bro's, u got competition
Comment
-
I never really comment on promoters but I will say I just seen Hearn about 1 month ago and hes a very friendly man. I didnt have any interaction with him as I do not flaunt for autographs or pics but a lot of people did and he went out of his way to come back to take pics with fans. I pretty much sat in front of him as hed come up between fights and talk to fans grinning ear to ear.
Last edited by Boxfan83; 01-01-2022, 12:18 PM.Comment
-
DAZN has flopped in the US.
Hearn couldn't get any of the top American fighters to jump to DAZN.
He's not a threat over here. You don't understand this market at all.
Comment
-
You won't get any sympathy from PBC fanboys mate. As you can see they're with Arum here, the man they don't normally have anything positive to say to.
You can count on them if Whyte is with PBC. Or with cases where they're siding with the opponent of the guy they hate. Loma vs Teo Lopez is an example. They screamed and yelled lowball for Lopez, made Arum/Loma looked like devils, even invoking the usual "he's risking his (Teo) life doe". It's clear they're only interested in their favored fighters' well being. Where is that hypocrite pretender? Why is he not defending Whyte here? Is Whyte not risking his life here? Where is he?Last edited by maguirre; 01-01-2022, 12:24 PM.Comment
-
The WBC's support of Canelo was ultimately proven to be correct as the world learned more about tainted meat in Mexico. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the levels in Canelo's system would now be legal under the current rules, yes?When Canelo was accused of a violation by VADA before the second GGG fight, the WBC came out in public and declared him to be innocent before an enquiry could be held. After the enquiry was completed and Canelo was found to be guilty and suspended, the WBC still insisted that he was innocent!
In Dillian Whyte's case the accusation alone was enough for them to remove him from their mandatory position. It took them a year to re-instate him because of the ridiculously slow, drawn out legal process that UKAD insist on going through before a PED case involving them can be formally resolved.
Whyte on the other hand had metabolites in his system for a straight up old school steroid that has no legitimate explanation for how it would be in his sytem.Comment
-
VADA and UKAD disagree with you on that.
The WBC's support of Canelo was ultimately proven to be correct as the world learned more about tainted meat in Mexico. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the levels in Canelo's system would now be legal under the current rules, yes?
Whyte on the other hand had metabolites in his system for a straight up old school steroid that has no legitimate explanation for how it would be in his sytem.
Excerpt from UKAD's statement after withdrawing their charge against Whyte:
"In respect of Mr Whyte's drug testing results, the following points are relevant:
• There is nothing in Mr Whyte's longitudinal urinary profile to suggest that he has used steroids.
• The levels of the metabolites found in Mr Whyte's 20 June 2019 sample were extremely low.
• Mr Whyte had provided a urine sample to VADA on 17 June 2019, i.e. 3 days before his 20 June 2019 sample, which was tested by a WADA-accredited laboratory and which returned a negative result, including for the metabolites in question.
• Mr Whyte provided several other doping control samples to UKAD and VADA between 20 June and 20 July 2019 (i.e. the date of his fight with Oscar Rivas) - all of which also tested negative.
• In light of the above points, the trace amounts of metabolites found in the 20 June 2019 sample are consistent with an isolated contamination event, and they are not suggestive of doping."
Comment
-
None of these turds (WBC, Hearn, Whyte, Fury, Arum, Warren) deserve sympathy or the impassioned defenses of fanboys.Comment
Comment