The anti-Hearn idiots are TERRIBLE for boxing.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Earl-Hickey
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 29031
    • 2,832
    • 1,384
    • 297,750

    #1

    The anti-Hearn idiots are TERRIBLE for boxing.

    After the WBC have mugged off Whyte again (showing they are a biased, corrupt organisation once again) I am now seeing the anti hearn fanboys hitting a new low.

    Since if the fight goes to purse bids, Hearn may bid BIG to get fury on DAZN, especially considering its Fury's last fight on his current contract with Top Rank, the Hearn haters are now saying Fury should beg the WBC to make him franchise champion and then he won't have to fight Whyte at all and wouldn't have to fight on DAZN if they win the purse bid.

    This type of attitude is CANCEROUS to the sport of boxing, absoloutley CANCEROUS.

    It's funny as well because they go on about rematch room and Eddie being "bad for the sport" and then they want to condone this just because the thought of Arum/Warren's biggest asset headlining an Eddie hearn promotion triggers them that much.

    These sort DISGUST me.
    ​​​​​
  • Outwest Exp 355
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2012
    • 9760
    • 1,183
    • 921
    • 47,595

    #2
    They made Whyte the mandatory so why are you crying? Now he can take his 20% or he can kick rocks. It wouldn’t be the first time he turned down a title shot. And then you and the rest of the Whyte circle jerkers can cry that nobody wants to fight you.

    Comment

    • WBC WBA IBF
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 1123
      • 305
      • 0
      • 61,791

      #3
      Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
      After the WBC have mugged off Whyte again
      The normal split is 70/30, but because Fury makes 15x than Whyte, it was modified to 80/20. What is unreasonable about that?

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #4
        Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

        The normal split is 70/30, but because Fury makes 15x than Whyte, it was modified to 80/20. What is unreasonable about that?
        This is the fat clown that claimed Wilder deserved 50% when Joshua was making 15X Wilder was.

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #5
          Fury has no intention of fighting Whyte. If he goes to purse bids he'll drop the belt.

          Comment

          • REDEEMER
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2018
            • 11820
            • 1,336
            • 1,008
            • 153,574

            #6
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            Fury has no intention of fighting Whyte. If he goes to purse bids he'll drop the belt.
            Sounds like it .

            Comment

            • Earl-Hickey
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 29031
              • 2,832
              • 1,384
              • 297,750

              #7
              Let's be clear on something I'm not a fan of Whyte and I think Fury beats him comfortably. The 20% deceleration by the WBC is pure trolling, I don't really care what Whyte gets but he does deserve more than 20%, maybe 30-35 would have been fine.

              But the real point of this thread is the Hearn haters who are saying Fury shouldn't fight Whyte.

              I don't even think this is out of fear Whyte would win but they are already getting itchy that DAZN/matchroom could outbid top rank which would be a very bad for top rank, and with this being Fury's last top rank contracted fight, he might end up LIKING dealing with DAZN and signing with them.

              The anti hearn mob FEAR this, and that's why they don't want the fight.

              Comment

              • Mammoth
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2016
                • 35717
                • 3,848
                • 3,389
                • 378,304

                #8
                Is this really about Hearn? He has his highs and lows like any promoter. Whyte is a dink and kinda has this coming but that's a different matter, lad.

                Comment

                • WBC WBA IBF
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 1123
                  • 305
                  • 0
                  • 61,791

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
                  The 20% deceleration by the WBC is pure trolling, I don't really care what Whyte gets but he does deserve more than 20%, maybe 30-35 would have been fine.
                  Why does he deserve more than 20% when Fury made 15x more than him in recent fights?

                  Comment

                  • WBC WBA IBF
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 1123
                    • 305
                    • 0
                    • 61,791

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    This is the fat clown that claimed Wilder deserved 50% when Joshua was making 15X Wilder was.
                    You seem very concerned with my physical condition. If you're so convinced I'm not in shape, I'm willing to compete with you in an athletic contest with a large wager. Let me know if you're interested.

                    Wilder wasn't Joshua's mandatory, but you're desperate to distract from the fact that you lied about Whyte being entitled to 45% and got caught posting old rules to try to fool everyone.

                    Joshua wasn't making 15x what Wilder was, but you're desperate to distract from the fact that you lied about Whyte being entitled to 45% and got caught posting old rules to try to fool everyone.

                    I didn't say Wilder deserved 50%, but you're desperate to distract from the fact that you lied about Whyte being entitled to 45% and got caught posting old rules to try to fool everyone.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP