Why do boxing fans care about purses so much?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 4truth
    U can't handle the Truth
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2016
    • 15276
    • 4,152
    • 1,672
    • 197,686

    #31
    Originally posted by Willie Pep 229

    In most sport you are paid for what you accomplished not what you might accomplish.

    Unless you're talking the pus*y a*s sports like golf, tennis, and synchronized swimming, then they do it your way.
    You’re asz backwards.

    Comment

    • Willie Pep 229
      hic sunt dracone
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2020
      • 6726
      • 2,945
      • 2,981
      • 29,169

      #32
      Let's be honest here, the real problem is the ********. Remember back in the day when a smart promoter could factor several 'large breasted' women into the equation to compensate for giving up a few percentage points? Not any more boy, try that today and watch how fast you get 'canceled' on Facebook.

      So much has been lost over the decades, the fight game just isn't what it use to be. Sad!

      Comment

      • Nash out
        BoxingScene Hall of Fame
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2018
        • 6126
        • 2,238
        • 1,851
        • 19,416

        #33
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett

        Your way would see fighters avoid tougher fights though. Why risk only making 20% against the tough fight when i can get 80% against the easy one.
        I mean this only in 1 vs 2 fights. Like when it's clear who 1 vs 2 is in the division, such as Spence vs Crawford as been the fight for years, it should be called out for a fight, and if they can't agree terms within a short period of time they have to put the excuse down, man-up, and fight on the terms laid down by the great Nash. Nash out.

        Comment

        • Willie Pep 229
          hic sunt dracone
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2020
          • 6726
          • 2,945
          • 2,981
          • 29,169

          #34
          Originally posted by 4truth

          You’re asz backwards.
          No not really - that's how an NFL QB negotiates his salary today, based on what he did, not on what he might do.

          It's why Ruth held out in 1926, he had already put up enough HRS and wanted to be compensated for them.

          Promises are not good bargaining chips, statistics are.
          Last edited by Willie Pep 229; 12-26-2021, 02:28 PM.

          Comment

          • 4truth
            U can't handle the Truth
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2016
            • 15276
            • 4,152
            • 1,672
            • 197,686

            #35
            Originally posted by Willie Pep 229

            No not really - that's how an NFL QB negotiates his salary today, based on what he did, not on what he might do.

            It's why Ruth held out in 1926, he had already put up enough HRS and wanted to be compensated for them.
            Those are all salaried team sports. Even then, the winners get paid for winning.

            Comment

            • QballLobo
              Undisputed Champion
              • Nov 2011
              • 7153
              • 1,310
              • 112
              • 48,002

              #36
              Originally posted by Willie Pep 229

              In most sport you are paid for what you accomplished not what you might accomplish.

              Unless you're talking the pus*y a*s sports like golf, tennis, and synchronized swimming, then they do it your way.
              A lot of NBA players come in at 19-20 then get their first big extension , $100 million guaranteed plus sometimes, before they do anything based one what they might be.
              Lots of NFL quarterbacks get big money before they do anything. Jimmy Garapolo got a $100 million deal from the 49ers and he started less than 10 games his first 4 years.

              Comment

              • Willie Pep 229
                hic sunt dracone
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2020
                • 6726
                • 2,945
                • 2,981
                • 29,169

                #37
                Originally posted by 4truth

                Those are all salaried team sports. Even then, the winners get paid for winning.
                Many of the top paid NFL players take a pay-cut for playoff games ('paid for winning'). I.e. they make more per season game than they do for winning playoff games.

                Comment

                • Willie Pep 229
                  hic sunt dracone
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2020
                  • 6726
                  • 2,945
                  • 2,981
                  • 29,169

                  #38
                  Originally posted by QballLobo

                  A lot of NBA players come in at 19-20 then get their first big extension , $100 million guaranteed plus sometimes, before they do anything based one what they might be.
                  Lots of NFL quarterbacks get big money before they do anything. Jimmy Garapolo got a $100 million deal from the 49ers and he started less than 10 games his first 4 years.
                  Yes very true - but also now qualified - at least in the NFL, with certain limitations placed on salaries offered to rookies. This came about by way of the Players Association who wanted to know why someone who never played a single game was making more than them.

                  I can't speak to the NBA.

                  But in the case of the established players, both in MLB and the NFL the really big contracts (long term) goes to the proven player and that comes with stats.

                  Aaron Rodgers got first round draft money when he was a rookie - you know that number doesn't come close to today's salary.
                  Last edited by Willie Pep 229; 12-26-2021, 03:02 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Toffee
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2018
                    • 7336
                    • 2,543
                    • 74
                    • 62,824

                    #39
                    Purses are what make fights happen. Therefore they're also what makes fights not happen.
                    ​​​​​
                    In the Fury v Whyte case I think we've got two teams who are petitioning the org instead of negotiating. It's not good for the division. It's a mandatory fight - it's the element of boxing that keeps it as being some kind of sport - these are supposed to be the easiest ones to make.

                    ​​​​​​
                    ​​
                    Last edited by Toffee; 12-26-2021, 03:07 PM.

                    Comment

                    • WBC WBA IBF
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 1123
                      • 305
                      • 0
                      • 61,791

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                      Why did you eat yourself into the michelin man?
                      Why did you lie about making million dollar bets when you live in an ****ty little apartment?
                      Why did you argue Wilder deserved 50% against Joshua when Wilder was making less than 2 mil a fight and Joshua was making 30+, but now say Whyte deserves 20?
                      Ok, so you admit your purposely posted old rules to try to fool everyone? And you're attacking me personally because you got caught trying to fool everyone?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP