Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canelo at Cruiser... WBC making up rules?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by M312 View Post

    Again, you are trying very hard to convince me about something you (nor me) have any idea about. And your dislike for the guy takes away any credibility for what you're typing anyway. Don't waste your energy, your agenda is transparent.
    What don’t we know about?

    We KNOW he rejected two eliminators.

    We KNOW he rejected a direct shot against Joshua.

    We KNOW a 40 year old Povetkin iced him.

    We KNOW he failed two drugs test.

    I have no agenda whatsoever, those are all facts. F*** the WBC, they’re money grabbing scumbags but that doesn’t change my stance on Whyte. He isn’t deserving of a title shot IMO, regardless of where the WBC choose to rank him.

    Comment


    • #32
      WBC= What Benefits Canelo

      Mauricio Sulaiman is never going to get on Canelo Bad Side ever again after he Froze them out for a few years. Last thing you want is the top Earn In Boxing Refusing to pay Sanctioning Fees. 3% out of a $40 Million Purse is a lot of more than 3% of a $1 Million Purse so yeah letting Canelo do WTF he wants is Good Business

      With that being said...WBC did the same for Mayweather

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
        Whyte didn’t duck Wallin which is purposely neglecting a fight you aren’t confident in winning but he avoided him for obvious reasons which was to secure a possible Fury fight .
        ""Dillian Whyte's doctor has explained the Briton will make a full recovery from the shoulder injury which forced him to withdraw from his bout with Otto Wallin.

        The heavyweight was set to face the Swedish contender in London next weekend with victory needed to set up a clash with Tyson Fury.

        But the 33-year-old has been forced to pull out of the bout after suffering a shoulder injury in training camp.

        And his doctor Harjinder Singh is confident that the issue can be fixed with rehabilitation and recovery and will not need more urgent treatment.

        "Dillian sustained a shoulder injury during training in preparation for his planned fight on October 30 2021, which I have assessed and confirmed with diagnostic imaging," Singh said.

        "I have treated the injury, but the injury will unfortunately prevent him from fighting in October. With immediate rest, physiotherapy and rehabilitation there should be no enduring concerns."


        now the lowest assumption would be 'oh yeh doctor took a little payoff to lie'
        but this doctor is credible. Look him up. He works for Leicester City FC, I doubt he is going to put his reputation on the line for a little payday from whyte who has less money than the many leicester city fc footballer these days. Eg guys like Vardy are on £140k a week.

        Whyte also said that he needed a good fight if he was going to head into any kind of fight vs someone like Tyson Fury. Not someone over the hill, but someone in his prime who people rate highly (in america esp because that's better for dazn). So Whyte obv was never afraid of Wallin. Furthermore, even when he took the fight, he was already in prime position for a WBC mandatory shot.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

          He refused to fight then but didn’t duck them? WTF?

          You Whyte fans are lunatics…
          what are you on about? he didnt duck anyone. plain and simple. He rejected a late notice £5m offer from AJ for the Wembley date. He also was very open and clear that it was WILDER/wbc route he wanted to go down. As i said, aj and whyte 2 will happen one day regardless of anything else.

          who else? ortiz?
          there are at least 3 points here
          1) whyte vs ortiz would have been for SECOND MANDATORY...meaning brezeale was still mandatory. Whyte openly said it is bs if it isn't for THE mandatory spot.
          2) why was ortiz even thrown in when he had his mandatory fight and lost? clear favouritism for pbc fighters. Whilst ortiz, brezeale, stiverne etc didnt have to do anything to get a mandatory shot, whyte was being messed around with.
          3) ortiz has no credibility. whyte has openly said numerous times that he said YES..and ortiz went awol. If this was a lie, ortiz would have publically responded. Reality was, we've all seen it, ortiz has no resume whatsoever and always pretends he wants big fight.

          has nothing to do with being a whyte fan. im making sense and you're being a hater.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

            What don’t we know about?

            We KNOW he rejected two eliminators.

            We KNOW he rejected a direct shot against Joshua.

            We KNOW a 40 year old Povetkin iced him.

            We KNOW he failed two drugs test.

            I have no agenda whatsoever, those are all facts. F*** the WBC, they’re money grabbing scumbags but that doesn’t change my stance on Whyte. He isn’t deserving of a title shot IMO, regardless of where the WBC choose to rank him.
            Capital letters and emojis don't make you anymore right. Just makes you seem more like that crazy dude ready to jump off the roof.

            It doesn't matter anyway, the WBC need to order a mandatory! Now!

            Well done for saying that they are scumbags, we're getting there.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by M312 View Post

              Capital letters and emojis don't make you anymore right. Just makes you seem more like that crazy dude ready to jump off the roof.

              It doesn't matter anyway, the WBC need to order a mandatory! Now!

              Well done for saying that they are scumbags, we're getting there.
              What did I say that was wrong?

              As I’ve said multiple times, everything I have said about Whyte is factually accurate.

              You’re showing your agenda here by ignoring the truth.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Inspired View Post

                ""Dillian Whyte's doctor has explained the Briton will make a full recovery from the shoulder injury which forced him to withdraw from his bout with Otto Wallin.

                The heavyweight was set to face the Swedish contender in London next weekend with victory needed to set up a clash with Tyson Fury.

                But the 33-year-old has been forced to pull out of the bout after suffering a shoulder injury in training camp.

                And his doctor Harjinder Singh is confident that the issue can be fixed with rehabilitation and recovery and will not need more urgent treatment.

                "Dillian sustained a shoulder injury during training in preparation for his planned fight on October 30 2021, which I have assessed and confirmed with diagnostic imaging," Singh said.

                "I have treated the injury, but the injury will unfortunately prevent him from fighting in October. With immediate rest, physiotherapy and rehabilitation there should be no enduring concerns."


                now the lowest assumption would be 'oh yeh doctor took a little payoff to lie'
                but this doctor is credible. Look him up. He works for Leicester City FC, I doubt he is going to put his reputation on the line for a little payday from whyte who has less money than the many leicester city fc footballer these days. Eg guys like Vardy are on £140k a week.

                Whyte also said that he needed a good fight if he was going to head into any kind of fight vs someone like Tyson Fury. Not someone over the hill, but someone in his prime who people rate highly (in america esp because that's better for dazn). So Whyte obv was never afraid of Wallin. Furthermore, even when he took the fight, he was already in prime position for a WBC mandatory shot.
                I guarantee Hearn sat with him pulled him to the side and said don’t go through with it . He tried doing doing that with Povetkin and that’s what got Whyte in trouble in the first place even though it was a fight he should have won then had to go reclaim his spot as a mandatory but the problem is the WBC never said he did even if it’s in their rules that any fighter that defeated a mandatory gets the position. Leading up to the fight everyone was starting to favor Wallin or at least give him a legit chance ,Wallins style is very difficult for Whyte and a definite potential loss ,when looking at the time of injury it’s just to convenient for me to believe Whyte . I believe he would have fought Wallin had Wilder defeated Fury because the mandatory then resets I think fir a new champion ?

                Im not saying it is right or wrong to avoid a fight you initially chose to get a guarantee of a bigger one it was actually probably smart I myself was slightly favoring Wallin though I do believe Whyte is problematic for Fury more then most stylistically and that’s probably why Fury doesn’t want that potential loss ? Either way Fury as a champion needs to take his first real first title defense and show he can do it ,I’m not counting Wilder it’s a joke as a first title defense when he beat the guy twice already .

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                  I guarantee Hearn sat with him pulled him to the side and said don’t go through with it . He tried doing doing that with Povetkin and that’s what got Whyte in trouble in the first place even though it was a fight he should have won then had to go reclaim his spot as a mandatory but the problem is the WBC never said he did even if it’s in their rules that any fighter that defeated a mandatory gets the position. Leading up to the fight everyone was starting to favor Wallin or at least give him a legit chance ,Wallins style is very difficult for Whyte and a definite potential loss ,when looking at the time of injury it’s just to convenient for me to believe Whyte . I believe he would have fought Wallin had Wilder defeated Fury because the mandatory then resets I think fir a new champion ?

                  Im not saying it is right or wrong to avoid a fight you initially chose to get a guarantee of a bigger one it was actually probably smart I myself was slightly favoring Wallin though I do believe Whyte is problematic for Fury more then most stylistically and that’s probably why Fury doesn’t want that potential loss ? Either way Fury as a champion needs to take his first real first title defense and show he can do it ,I’m not counting Wilder it’s a joke as a first title defense when he beat the guy twice already .
                  So the fact that there's a credible doctor who represents Leicester City FC aswell as Leicester Tigers (rugby) and has worked with the English rugby national team aswell, would come out in public to confirm DW's injury and surgery, is not enough?

                  Everything else is an assumption. However, what you don't seem to realise is, Whyte has historically benefited from this whole 'mandatory/not-mandatory' narrative. it's helped him keep himself in the spotlight and made him a bigger name in the UK. He got £4m from the povetkin 2 fight and would have done similar for a Wallin fight. He isnt going to make a lot more vs Fury. in fact it benefits whyte to keep on fighting lesser fighters but keep the whole narrative running. In otherwords Whyte wanted another nice payday from a wallin fight. furthermore, with or without a guaranteed mandatory spot, if whyte ever feared wallin why would he have taken it? it makes no sense.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    It's a ****EN trophy... Don't lose sleep over it. Canelo trying to improve his resume by trying **** YOUR favorite fighter is SCUUUURED to do.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

                      What did I say that was wrong?

                      As I’ve said multiple times, everything I have said about Whyte is factually accurate.

                      You’re showing your agenda here by ignoring the truth.
                      Well if say its factually correct it must be lol

                      You have no clue what's real and not.

                      The Whyte fans will say it's not and you will say it is.

                      You seem the type who would drown a 'witch'.

                      Stop trying to convince me of something that none of us know anything about. It's pointless.

                      You hate him though, I get it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP