Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canelo at Cruiser... WBC making up rules?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by tritium_arma View Post
    WBC making up rules by making 190 the new cruiserweight division and selectively enforcing mandatories.
    - -200 the current cruiser limit.

    Y U make up shllt?

    'Toopid?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by M312 View Post

      Well if say its factually correct it must be lol

      You have no clue what's real and not.

      The Whyte fans will say it's not and you will say it is.

      You seem the type who would drown a 'witch'.

      Stop trying to convince me of something that none of us know anything about. It's pointless.

      You hate him though, I get it.
      Name one thing I said that is factually incorrect?

      You keep ducking that question because you know everything I’ve said is true.

      Whyte fans have zero basis to say anything I’ve stated is not correct. Most of them would admit it was true because it f***ing is!

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Inspired View Post

        what are you on about? he didnt duck anyone. plain and simple. He rejected a late notice £5m offer from AJ for the Wembley date. He also was very open and clear that it was WILDER/wbc route he wanted to go down. As i said, aj and whyte 2 will happen one day regardless of anything else.

        who else? ortiz?
        there are at least 3 points here
        1) whyte vs ortiz would have been for SECOND MANDATORY...meaning brezeale was still mandatory. Whyte openly said it is bs if it isn't for THE mandatory spot.
        2) why was ortiz even thrown in when he had his mandatory fight and lost? clear favouritism for pbc fighters. Whilst ortiz, brezeale, stiverne etc didnt have to do anything to get a mandatory shot, whyte was being messed around with.
        3) ortiz has no credibility. whyte has openly said numerous times that he said YES..and ortiz went awol. If this was a lie, ortiz would have publically responded. Reality was, we've all seen it, ortiz has no resume whatsoever and always pretends he wants big fight.

        has nothing to do with being a whyte fan. im making sense and you're being a hater.
        I stopped reading at late notice. Whyte was given 4 months notice.

        As I said lunatics.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

          Name one thing I said that is factually incorrect?

          You keep ducking that question because you know everything I’ve said is true.

          Whyte fans have zero basis to say anything I’ve stated is not correct. Most of them would admit it was true because it f***ing is!
          There is zero way of knowing if any of this is fact. It's literally hearsay and gossip from a boxing forum.

          I'm not sure you understand what the word 'fact' even means.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

            I stopped reading at late notice. Whyte was given 4 months notice.

            As I said lunatics.
            stop with this divisive nonsense eg 'you whyte fans'. This is not about being a whyte fan.
            a couple of things you forgot, whyte had only just fought Chisora in December. He was offered the AJ fight a month later...late January.
            The fight would have been mid April.
            Really it would have been around 10 weeks.

            £5m is what he was offered, for AJ..why would he take that eg he just earned £4m vs povetkin 2...
            so he would force himself to fight AJ for £5m and lose any leverage with the wbc mandatory narrative that enables whyte to constantly earn good sums of money and remain the spotlight.
            totally bad business to fight aj..and it's only a secondary argument this one. The fact is whyte was a threat to beyonce, so they messed him about..but these dog poo part time boxers like brezeale, molina, stiverne etc get easy mandatory spots.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

              - -200 the current cruiser limit.

              Y U make up shllt?

              'Toopid?
              Why you can’t read or search? Illiteracy?

              https://www.boxingscene.com/wbc-prez...weight--153214

              https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...erweight-title

              Hint, search for 190 on each page.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by M312 View Post

                There is zero way of knowing if any of this is fact. It's literally hearsay and gossip from a boxing forum.

                I'm not sure you understand what the word 'fact' even means.
                You’re either delusional or incredibly ******.

                How can you not know whether somebody failing two drug tests is true or not when the testers CONFIRMED it. It’s a f***ing fact.

                WTF is going on in this thread…

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Inspired View Post

                  stop with this divisive nonsense eg 'you whyte fans'. This is not about being a whyte fan.
                  a couple of things you forgot, whyte had only just fought Chisora in December. He was offered the AJ fight a month later...late January.
                  The fight would have been mid April.
                  Really it would have been around 10 weeks.

                  £5m is what he was offered, for AJ..why would he take that eg he just earned £4m vs povetkin 2...
                  so he would force himself to fight AJ for £5m and lose any leverage with the wbc mandatory narrative that enables whyte to constantly earn good sums of money and remain the spotlight.
                  totally bad business to fight aj..and it's only a secondary argument this one. The fact is whyte was a threat to beyonce, so they messed him about..but these dog poo part time boxers like brezeale, molina, stiverne etc get easy mandatory spots.
                  I’m not reading any of your nonsense man. You’re only wasting your own time typing it out.

                  Your profile picture is of a troll. We all know what your game is.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

                    You’re either delusional or incredibly ******.

                    How can you not know whether somebody failing two drug tests is true or not when the testers CONFIRMED it. It’s a f***ing fact.

                    WTF is going on in this thread…
                    He got cleared for one of them, so about as fuctually correct as everything else you have said!

                    You can hate and be level headed. You don't have to be a crazy!

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by M312 View Post

                      He got cleared for one of them, so about as fuctually correct as everything else you have said!

                      You can hate and be level headed. You don't have to be a crazy!
                      I said he failed two tests. Getting cleared doesn’t change that.

                      Idiot…

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP