At what point does beating Pacquiao no longer count because he's old?

[GypsyTRAIN]

so if beating manny isn’t a big deal then manny can’t be the best of his era and certainly not as high as you have him ranked all time.

It also means manny’s wins aren’t a big deal because most people think he’s better than all the guys he beat. But that is obviously wrong.

According to you when manny loses, no big deal. When manny wins he’s the best and it’s significant.i It’s like you’re swallowing his cum as you post.

Beating a 42 year old Manny is not impressive. Beating a 42 year old Manny would be like beating a 36 year old Floyd...good win but not impressive.

Manny just like Duracell battery and last long time

[Larry the boss]

Hell according to the stans on here no matter who or when he loses it never counts and there is always an excuse where the person who beats him not only gets no credit but are trashed

[Larry the boss]

being old isn't an excuse? lmaoooo. at what sport. chess? you guys like to say whatever it's hilarious. Pac at 35 was still a beast, but it was obvious he's a step behind from his prime. He fought floyd at 35. and floyd was 37. Fans only wanted them to fight during their absolute primes, you can't beat a guy at Floyd's level if you're anything less than your best version.

Now reverse urgas and pacquiao's age and let's here you say old isn't an excuse. 43 is super old when you have a style like pacman.

yet Floyd was still p4p#1, 2 division unified,lineal champ and undefeated yet ive seen you discredit him over and over again...a guy at 38 beat a guy like Manny while Manny was younger yet he gets no credit...look at what you just posted and reverse it and tell me how it makes sense

[MikeyMike100]

It hasn't reached that point yet. I think if he fights agaain and loses people will start saying that

[Larry the boss]

people are biased when it comes to Manny..if Floyd came back right now and lost they would trash him...he looked back in a damn exhibition and was trashed....But from a real boxing stand point..

Manny is great but is not far past it..but it still takes a world class boxer to beat him at this point in his career..but this man has been given far more passes and excuses then anyone I have ever seen

[BendOver]

We're already there IMO. Dude's legs looked shot, and his stamina has fallen off. Dude just barely eeked one out over a rusty Thurman and that was 2 years ago.

Bs, he thew over 800 punches, he couldn't move because he got hit, hard to the body, he complained to the ref, and wasn't a low blow. That prevented Ugas from keep hitting the body. He didn't lost his legs, Ugas make him do it.

[The tucker]

Nobody ever gets credit for beating Manny Pacquiao bro! Ever!

Marquez flatlined the dude and still don’t get credit “Lacky Panch”

That’s because he was roided out of his mind and more of a mayweather fan. It’s very clear Marquez was cheating in that fight

[Ricardi]

After he got knocked out by Marquez

[AboutBillions]

That’s because he was roided out of his mind and more of a mayweather fan. It’s very clear Marquez was cheating in that fight

Same for when PAC for Marquez 3 times he was clearly on that energiser bunny rabbit roids

[The Big Dunn]

Beating a 42 year old Manny is not impressive. Beating a 42 year old Manny would be like beating a 36 year old Floyd...good win but not impressive.

Manny just like Duracell battery and last long time

Every other loss for Manny wasn’t when he was 42.