I said earlier boxing should just get rid of records. Biased media/fans say losses don’t matter and one fan even said Manny could lose 10 times in a row and it wouldn’t matter.
Certain Manny fans never count any loss he has. They pick and choose which people that beat him get credit as a way to argue he is better than Floyd.
Don't worry that nobody gets credit for beating a former flyweight with 70 fights under belt. Floyd fans say Floyd s win over pac is amazing and better than any Pac win has and there's nothing Pac can do to equal that so why the sad tone?
So even though nobody gets credit for beating pac, Floyd is the only one isn't he? Floyd s best win according to just about everyone. Not a great resume floyd
most boxers are lucky to be still fighting well 35 and over, if u dont take care of yourself even earlier, when i see a boxer is 35 im thinking hhhmm ok good for him still mixing it up, pac still going very good after 40, thats amazing in my book
Don't worry that nobody gets credit for beating a former flyweight with 70 fights under belt. Floyd fans say Floyd s win over pac is amazing and better than any Pac win has and there's nothing Pac can do to equal that so why the sad tone?
So even though nobody gets credit for beating pac, Floyd is the only one isn't he? Floyd s best win according to just about everyone. Not a great resume floyd
so if beating manny isn’t a big deal then manny can’t be the best of his era and certainly not as high as you have him ranked all time.
It also means manny’s wins aren’t a big deal because most people think he’s better than all the guys he beat. But that is obviously wrong.
According to you when manny loses, no big deal. When manny wins he’s the best and it’s significant.i It’s like you’re swallowing his cum as you post.
We're already there IMO. Dude's legs looked shot, and his stamina has fallen off. Dude just barely eeked one out over a rusty Thurman and that was 2 years ago.
so if beating manny isn’t a big deal then manny can’t be the best of his era and certainly not as high as you have him ranked all time.
It also means manny’s wins aren’t a big deal because most people think he’s better than all the guys he beat. But that is obviously wrong.
According to you when manny loses, no big deal. When manny wins he’s the best and it’s significant.i It’s like you’re swallowing his cum as you post.
Beating Pac is a big deal but there's levels to how much credit you get. Morales beating Pac was a great win. Jmm beating Pac was a great win but he needed 4 attempts. And if you beat past prime former flyweight who you are much naturally bigger than like horn did. Then Rob pac in a fight like Bradley/horn/Floyd did, who also had home advantage and IVs then it's hard to give much credit.
Each case is taken on its own merit. But great fighters lose..Does Randy turpin deserve gold medal or something for beating SRR, or should we praise S R r for what he did? SRR is only a great win for someone because of what SRR has done to make himself worthy of being considered a great win for someone, so essentially did all the hard work. Sorry for being this deep. I know you prefer thinking black and white. Not saying I'm deep or anything
Being old isn't an excuse. Ugas was 35, that's the same age Pac was when his fans were claiming he was washed up. So Pac lost to another to a fighter who was also washed. It balances out. And yes it does hurt his resume. He's lost to mediocre fighters in Horn and Ugas now.
Comment